negativenull

joined 1 year ago
[–] negativenull@startrek.website 18 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

Eleven Rikers Riking:

[–] negativenull@startrek.website 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

The Orville - Pastafarianism
Galaxy Quest - Rastafarianism

[–] negativenull@startrek.website 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The original series in the 1970s leaned more into Mormon cosmology. The more recent version didn't do that as much, so it's harder to tell.

[–] negativenull@startrek.website 7 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Battlestar Galactica should surly be Mormonism

[–] negativenull@startrek.website 44 points 11 months ago

The smoke that comes out of computers sometimes is caused by the little people getting pissed off and lighting little fires out of protest.

[–] negativenull@startrek.website 4 points 11 months ago

DS9 has all sorts of complications that could fit any number of things I think (Bajorans/Prophets, Maquis, Founders, Jem'Hadar, Dominion, etc).

[–] negativenull@startrek.website 4 points 11 months ago

Nice, it's good to get some validation!

[–] negativenull@startrek.website 3 points 11 months ago

That might work better?

[–] negativenull@startrek.website 16 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (19 children)

TOS - Judaism
TNG - Christianity
DS9 - Islam
Voyager - Baháʼí
NuTrek - Dudeism

(just in case: please nobody be offended, this is a joke about the evolution of religion based on time)

[–] negativenull@startrek.website 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Oh, almost a BradyBunch motif! I like it!

[–] negativenull@startrek.website 48 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The picture provided in that article is gold:
Giuliani

 
  • The Supreme Court upheld Washington state's law banning "conversion therapy" for minors, despite dissent from three conservative justices.
  • An appellate panel struck down local bans on conversion therapy in Florida, deeming them an unconstitutional restriction on counselors' speech.
  • Justice Clarence Thomas argued that the court should have taken up the case and considered the First Amendment challenge to the law.
 
 
 
 
178
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by negativenull@startrek.website to c/risa@startrek.website
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
view more: ‹ prev next ›