I don't even see the code. All I see is heading, emphasis, dot-points ...
null_dot
I just don't see the point of obsidian et al.
Just use a directory structure and save markdown files in it.
There are many apps that are great editors for this structure on every platform. IDK exactly what obsidian does but many editors have zettelkasten (fancy cross links) functionality, just no fancy graph.
Ghostty + helix is the sexxy RN.
Hol up. Are notes stored in files in a directory structure or a single file? Just that you said "the file" so I'm wondering.
If so, that's lock in.
That's the whole point of markdown lmfao.
Yeah I don't think either of them would care in the slightest about this type of polling.
Entirely predictable.
Trump was mocking the voting public on presidents day with that "Long live the king" quip.
That said, it's just bonkers that 40% of voters feel like things are going in the right direction. Honestly the whole thing is cooked.
Yeah.
Sadly I think email will be with us for the foreseeable future. It's broken, sure... but it's just so fundamental to the web.
An alternative would need to be ubiquitous, and that seems unachievable.
Congrats to the new admins!
As regards instant recall, I'm new here (but not new to lemmy and the broader fediverse) and don't feel I have much of a voice regarding how things are run. I also don't have much experience with the concepts of anarchism and the idea of instant recall is new to me, but I do have a lot of experience in governance for large organisations.
That said, I have some concerns.
Primarily, I can't see how including yourself can work in practice. Even if 70% of voters decide that your actions are contrary to the desires of the instance, you will be confident that your own actions are necessary and justified (otherwise you wouldn't have taken those actions). You've already acknowledged that you're a foul play failsafe. So I guess I'm saying, from your perspective any motion to recall your mandate is very likely to appear to be foul play.
Sadly, I'm conditioned to suggest having a robust code of conduct and a committee to refer breaches to, but I suspect that is not the way of anarchism.
Regardless, I'm very happy to support this instance and look forward to seeing where you take it.
There's a number of problems with this.
It would only work if enough communities and instances adhered rigidly to similar editorial decisions about what is "political". I don't think that's achievable.
Mods would have to do the heavy lifting in tagging/ untangling things.
It's not going to be as simple to implement as you think.
Posts are already categorised by community. You can block the vast majority of political posts by blocking a few communities and users.
At times if filtered out keywords like Musk and Trump. You don't really need to implement a feature for this. Just get posters to include a tag in the title of their post.
Looking at your other comments, you're not going to be deterred by these criticisms, so my suggestion would be to find the git repo and create an issue to get some proper feedback from other contributors.
It's 6 months old.
Reported on by some major news outlets.
AfD has form for doing exactly this kind of ambiguous gesture.
Old mate didn't provide any fascinating insights into the manufacturing practices of soviet era communism, they just trotted out some meme-level anti-capitalist vibe-based hyperbole.
Plenty of answers here but I don't think anyone has answered this part:
So here's my take ...
Musk did the sig heil as a fuck you to everyone that doesn't like him. That's it.
They just won the election by basically lying, ignoring, and playing for time. They can literally do whatever the fuck they like for the next n years with impunity.
Imagine if Harris had won and in her victory speech said something like "Don't worry Don, I'll make sure they give you diapers in jail." It would've been a low blow but we would've loved her for it because it's poking fun at the conservatives for no other reason than to stir them up.
I think there's another, longer conversation to be had about why racism (and by extension nazism) resonates with voters in 2025, but I'm too weary for that I think.