ormr

Wieso musst du die gleiche Anmerkung 3x im gleichen thread posten?

I'm sorry but the online propaganda warriors don't have humour.

Okay, but you're misinformed and trying to prove a point that's just not related to the report linked in this thread. If you were interested in if this statistic is useful and what information is contained in it, you'd just translate some pages and read before making wild assumptions based on nothing but your ideology.

Yes, violence does not constitute the major part of felonies mentioned in the report. 37% are property damage and "propaganda offences" = using anti-constitutional symbols like swastikas, etc. A further 40% are insults, intimidation, coercion, incitement of violence, etc. And this has nothing to do with hate speech laws. It's not the state who's suing here but people who have been insulted, intimidated, etc. and it's of course very much their right to sue in this case.

Except that her boss now owns 10000 homes.

Can recommend the book flash boys about the topic of dark pools, high frequency trading, etc. and how the setup, the parameters of this system enables fraud.

It seems like we also don't care what the damage is or else we would make at least some effort to secure our IT systems. Of course the robber should be blamed but those who leave their doors wide open are guilty too. If we care so much about the consequences of ransomware attacks, why do we not act and avoid shitty software that only compromises security and instead built more resilient systems?

Und er hat diesen gelöscht wegen "geil"?

Yes, I think this is what we're gonna see. Even more so once the far right takes power. They will use the anti-hate speech laws against their creators because they are easy to abuse.

Lol, no one who just "expresses concern" will be sued in Germany. It will always be insults and incitement to violence that will lead to this.

However I would say that there have been trials because of really "easy" insults, started by politicians. And here you've got a point IMO that these laws are also used for intimidation. As a politician you should be able to tolerate some insults without having to sue each and every offender out there.

I totally understand this feeling but let me tell you that German politicians are likewise using these numbers to label their own populace as lazy. So actually politicians don't seem to really care about nationality when they can smear someone and destruct the welfare state.

But maybe Germans deserve it a bit more lol.

Das hat kaum mit Unternehmen zu tun. Die Börsenpreise für Strom sinken seit dem Start der liberalisierten Energiemärkte in Europa kontinuierlich.

Was in DE seit Jahren steigt sind die Netzentgelte. Der Staat wollte die Investitionen in die Infrastruktur nicht leisten, also zahlt es jetzt der Verbraucher.

Und dann gibts so Spezialisten wir die Bayern, deren Industrie mit am meisten Strom benötigt. Deren Staatsregierung hat sich aber stets für unterirdische Leitungen eingesetzt, was im Bau leider 5-fache Kosten verursacht.

Das ist kein Marktversagen, das ist Staatsversagen.