Or maybe their candidates shouldn't support genocide. It'd be much easier to sell the Democrats as a valid party to vote for if they weren't in support of things like genocide.
piefood
joined 3 weeks ago
No, what got us Trump 2.0 was the Democrats running a shitty candidate, on the coattails of another shitty candidate, on the coattails of a shitty presidential run. People were clamoring for a new candidate that actualy gave a shit, and the Democrats told them to sit down and shut up.
The Democrats chose money, war-mongers, and genocide over winning a slam-dunk election. It's not the voter's fault that we're here, as they loudly told the Democrats what they wanted. It's the Democrat's fault for ignoring those demands from their base.
Why should people vote for a party that fights against what they want, when they can vote for a third party that is fighting for what they want?
Link because I don't think I can upload images on here: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FjBAU1OWAAAJB8W?format=jpg&name=medium
I actually have no idea, it just looks like an AI drawing to me. The fact that the glass is answering makes it a bit sus
As the other post said, Heroic Launcher is great. I've also had good luck with Lutris
Yeah, it's almost like progressives aren't interested in identity politics, and stayed home when the supposedly-leftist party told them to shut up.
the AI that generated the image!
/me laughs at OpenAI, then prompts his self-hosted AI to laugh at them as well
I mean... Biden did that, why wouldn't Kamala have done the same? She promised to continue the Biden policies.
And FWIW, I did vote against fascism
8=%=D
view more: next ›
This sounds more like the Democrats than it does the "moderate left"