Yeah this a wall of text. To be honest I can't really spend my already limited time reading 15 paragraphs from someone who ignores relevant points I raise.
In this case, I addressed the ban reason given, and yet you try to argue more about it as though I didn't. If you cared about more than disputing me, you might see that this was probably death by a million paper cuts.
Maybe you can provide an example?
RIP. I'm sure he'll be back with alts, but here are the final stats:
UniversalMonk stats pulled 10/25/2024, 3:20:53 PM EDT
None of this takes into account time reading others' posts/comments, or alts this user may have. See the modlog for any communities they've been banned from.
Top 5 duplicate submissions (of 914 exact matches and 683 which are 70%+ similar)
Fetch user stats yourself with: https://codeberg.org/p00perNickel/lemmy-user-stats
I think it's obvious I've thought a lot about this, if you have any context outside of these couple of comments here. Which if you've been noticing this user at all, you would have a lot more context... Mods addressed it here, for example.
In any case, the mods/admins finally decided that they agree with the extremely popular opinion you're taking issue with. He's permabanned now.
Their stated reason is a little confusing, because they mention dms specifically. That's certainly true and I've been on the receiving end of that several times actually. Just a couple nights ago they were dming me, bragging hard about how great their life is and how they have tons of free time to post. Stuff like "I get to do whatever I want, allll day. My house is paid off, I have all day, so I can do that. My life is great!"
The modlog links to a rule that cites sealioning and trolling being not ok. So I suspect after the influx of complaints they got, they almost had trouble even picking a specific explanation. The dude was 100% trying to piss people off and succeeded many, many, thousands of times.
To address your criticism of my script, a couple days ago one of the mods told me explicitly they were using it as evidence when talking to admins about the issue. Another mod said a few of them were playing with it and finding it useful.
Two days later, dude is banned. So yeah, the remaining tides turned. I think the script was a large part of it. I'm certain he'll be back with alts, so the script I wrote for problem users like this will likely come in handy moving forward.
So that number three spot is suspect to me too. I would've assumed a lot of users over time would have broken -4000. Also aren't you the dude defending UM to me yesterday? What's your deal?
haha wow! Thanks for that. So apparently I could just run my own instance to get access to that data... cool, but raises questions. :/ Does it also federate more private data, like DMs?
Dude, you're clearly being super unfair here. They are just posting articles, MAN!
UniversalMonk@lemmy.world "Socialist Mormon Satanist" stats pulled @ 10/24/2024, 2:38:45 PM EDT
Account created 77 days ago (8/8/2024, 9:21:38 PM EDT)
6,247 submissions (= 1,999 posts + 4,248 comments)
81.1 avg submissions / day
11.8 mins avg time between submissions (assuming 8 hrs of sleep / day)
91,184 downvotes accrued (0.19 u:d ratio)
~ 16 typed pages (3,819 words) written / day
~ 139 hrs commenting/posting in 77 days, which breaks down to:
None of this takes into account time reading others' posts/comments, or alts this user may have. See the modlog to see the communities they've been banned from.
Top 10 duplicate submissions (of 323 exact matches and 229 which are 70%+ similar)
Fetch user stats yourself with: https://codeberg.org/p00perNickel/lemmy-user-stats
Says the account harassing me in DMs
You're clearly picking the less popular opinion. This is either obvious to you or it isn't. The numbers are there, and you chose your reading of them. I cannot do anything about that.
Yes, the mark of being non-contrary -- cherry picking the opinion you already agree with as evidence
No examples then. Cool.