ISP around me had policies like "we can provide Usenet except for the binaries trees"

Cubes are the worst of both worlds. You have the noise of open plan, but the lack of visibility of other people like offices

The common refrain of how we're doomed by climate change and the fact we can't fix it, so nothing matters anyway has their fingerprints all over it

It's funny that they went out of fashion at the same time people started getting fat

High rise trousers belt above the hips, giving no chance of showing a plumber's crack, holding them up solidly

RIFTS is set in the future, 300 years after an apocalypse brought magic back to earth

It's fantasy + sci fi

I see zero subscribers, zero posts. I'm not breaking that streak

If I must

Although dictionaries will show words that significant parts of the population say are wrong, I'm still going to say octopuses is also correct because octopus is an English word and English usually pluralises like that

Octopusen is not common since octopus is too new to get that style of English plural

Of course significant parts of the population spell "than" with an e, or "then" with an a, and/or don't know the difference between it's and its

Would you care to pluralise octagon?

Internal combustion cars are about half as efficient as big fossil fuel powerplants. The big ones waste a third of the energy as low grade heat; cars waste two thirds of the energy as low grade heat

Don't forget that big batteries can react in fractions of a second to large power demand spikes or dips, stabilising the grid far better than spinning steel can

There are workflows using LLMs that seem fair to me, for example

• using an LLM to produce a draft, then
• Editing and correcting the LLM draft
• Finding real references and replacing the hallucinated ones
• Correcting LLM style to your style

That seems like more work than doing it properly, but it avoids some of the sticking points of the proper process

LLMs can't cite. They don't know what a citation is other than a collection of text of a specific style

You'd be lucky if the number of references equalled the number of referenced items even if you were lucky enough to get real sources out of an LLM

If the student is clever enough to remove the trap reference, the fact that the other references won't be in the University library should be enough to sink the paper