If it is your project, no need to get headaches about this. However keep for example the stuff like “Copyright YEAR - your-name” and say it’s under GPL 3 license. But nothing more.
It is kind of copyfarleft, so by essence it is it open source according to the OSI definition (which must by the only definition to use), more free / libre according to the FSF definition (which is the only definition also to keep).
Interesting! Do you remember where you got this chart?
You can for example have a look on the online resource below:
https://www.securemessagingapps.com/
It is very interesting with a big comparison grid between plenty of messaging solutions.
Why not using Firefox, Firefox Focus or Brave?
The disappearance of all these tech peacocks and web turkeys who focus on their number of followers and the quantity of talks rather than quality. The dev rel advocates made the atmosphere toxic
Feel free to share your feedback to the team behind the project, they are awesome 😄
Woops, the French developers behind the project didn’t know 😂
So annoying. It is useless to bring gamification to open source projects. It won’t enhance quality nor bring reliable contributors. People should contribute to FLOSS projects without such things IMO.
I still don’t understand why Hacktoberfest get so much hype. I don’t even understand Hacktoberfest meanings. Is it to get shiny badges on GitHub accounts?
There is one definition of free in FLOSS. The FSF definition.