raevn

joined 2 years ago
[–] raevn@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

It's a strange beast, i feel like I'd like it as alow powered desktop substitute as it's too powerful/draws roouch power to be used in place of a microcontroller. But it's not got enough ram to act as a useful desktop either. Probably just my own usecase, but 16GB would be perfect

[–] raevn@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago (5 children)

i wish they'd make a verson with more ram!

[–] raevn@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

If you're not happy with the software there's a good chance others are also dissatisfied and van make the chage, this happens all the time. Perhaps some of them are children without a full time job and don't mind spending time understanding something ;-) The point I'm making is that the users of the software have an additional option not available to closed source software.

[–] raevn@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

And at any time you or someone else who is likewise pissed off can fork the software and put it straight

[–] raevn@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago

I may have xome later to both, I find either very usable + no ads

[–] raevn@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And you're stuck with potential security issues/missing regulatory chages, lack of new features....

[–] raevn@sh.itjust.works 34 points 2 years ago (20 children)

Like Lemmy is to Reddit, FOSS clients are to paid alternatives.

The only way I can see to stay clear of business practices I don't like is to support the FOSS model.

I'm not saying Sync isn't a good client, or that the dev has anything other than the best intersts of his users in mind, it's that at any point a decision can be made which you have no control over. Service models for software, for example, very rarely seems to be in the users interests.

Give the FOSS clients a shot, they are also constantly improving!