Shortbus (2006)
ram
joined 1 year ago
If you generate something with AI and claim you created it yourself you can easily be asked to reproduce a similar works again.
Asked by whom exactly? The Copyright Office? Are they going to ask for prove from every artist that requests registration for a work?
If you say you did use AI you should be able to show how much effort you are putting into creating the images
Or you can lie in your request. From the Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices:
"As a general rule, the U.S. Copyright Office accepts the facts stated in the registration materials, unless they are contradicted by information provided elsewhere in the registration materials or in the Office’s records."
In practical terms? If you are going to generate content using AI either don't say it was AI generated or lie about how much human involvement it had. Also you can't use "this work was completely made by AI" as a hook.
That latter case likely wont be copyrightable
It is if you don't say it's AI generated or you lie about how much human input it required which would be impossible to prove false.
they generate from stealing the work of thousands of human artists.
Has this been litigated yet?
Only if you say it was written by an AI, that's the lesson here.
because since some diffusion generation are deterministic
You are generalizing and using the word "some" at the same time.
Linux Hater's Blog was half satire and half honest criticism.
With the shit some governments pulled during the first rounds of vaccination you can't blame people for being skeptical.
What would be a solution to this conflict?
That hasn't been determined yet. A human prompt used by the AI to generate content might be enough to grant copyright. This case is about autonomous AI generated content.