sanosuke001

joined 1 year ago
[–] sanosuke001@lemmynsfw.com 96 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Yeah good luck to southeast states during hurricane season and Texas during Ted Cruz Cancun season

[–] sanosuke001@lemmynsfw.com 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Friend, I hope you can continue enjoying life and it isn't past tense only. If you're unsure, please reach out and find the help you need πŸ’™

As for your sentiment, I feel the same, cosmic dust but okay with that thought; enjoy life as it is, unworried about what is or is not after.

[–] sanosuke001@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 month ago

I was thinking the same thing, I always drop the flour by a bit to get that effect. The only way to make chocolate chip cookies imo

[–] sanosuke001@lemmynsfw.com 56 points 3 months ago

I'd even be happy with there being a choice between "either release tools needed to unlock and run services necessary to function OR release all source code to public domain so someone else is able to fix and rebuild the software as necessary"

If I pay for something they shouldn't be able to disable it

[–] sanosuke001@lemmynsfw.com 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I bought a Sun Microsystems 24" widescreen CRT for $400 on eBay back in 2003ish? iirc. It was 100lbs and delivered on a pallet lol. There's a reason why they didn't get very big and were mostly 4:3. 1920x1200 and like 30" deep! But, they did exist!

[–] sanosuke001@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 5 months ago

They should make the dodging and parying soulslike. They really wanted parying to be used in rebirth but it feels so bad.

[–] sanosuke001@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 5 months ago

I was not familiar with this historical fact, thanks for the info! That's definitely a good example of why it shouldn't bar someone outright.

[–] sanosuke001@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 5 months ago

12 peers can be coerced. If he still runs the rest of the country should be sufficient to not vote for him if he is undeserving of being elected. In theory it should be more difficult just by way of having more scrutiny into the type of person he is to the voters.

[–] sanosuke001@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 5 months ago

And they should again.

[–] sanosuke001@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

So, let's say a political party is somehow at fault for charging and getting a verdict of an opponent. This would make it very easy to block anyone from running against the party in power if they so choose.

The founding fathers saw how much of an issue this would be so limited the reasons for blocking someone from running for office. I don't think hush money is a good reason (though, doing so to block info that would make him lose an election I think should be but that will be up to the court)

view more: next β€Ί