skaffi

joined 4 months ago
[–] skaffi@infosec.pub 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Use OBS for streaming. It's a great FOSS piece of software. You generally don't stream your whole desktop, but instead make a composite of different sources, such as different windows. Start experimenting with it if, if you want to start streaming soon. Same for you, @boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net!

[–] skaffi@infosec.pub 1 points 4 weeks ago

And besides QMMP, Audacious also traces its code roots back to XMMS.

[–] skaffi@infosec.pub 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Whether that's the case or not, I think it is secondary to the fact that he clearly says on the website that he definitely doesn't want it to go open source, for as long as he is working on it.

[–] skaffi@infosec.pub 2 points 4 weeks ago

I don't know. Try visualising him with Milkdrop.

[–] skaffi@infosec.pub 18 points 1 month ago (3 children)

What a shame that it isn't open source.

I'll happily continue to use Audacious with a Winamp skin.

[–] skaffi@infosec.pub 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This might be philosophical, but I think a lot of people make a mistake, when they assume that just because something is made up, it somehow makes that thing less real, and less of an obstacle to overcome. The quality of being made up says something about a thing's origin, not about its level of realness.

As stated, that notion might be philosophical, but following it's own rules, that doesn't impact the degree to which it, as with any other idea, exists as a thing that has the quality of realness (distinct from truth value) to it.

[–] skaffi@infosec.pub 6 points 2 months ago

Yes, that's the issue.

[–] skaffi@infosec.pub 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

While I was still on Windows, the killer feature that kept WinRar installed, instead of only using 7zip, was the simple fact that its file explorer supported hotkeys like Ctrl+C, and that you could seamlessly copy files to and from Windows' file explorer.

[–] skaffi@infosec.pub 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I didn't hear or see. Do you have a link, or care to elaborate?

[–] skaffi@infosec.pub 49 points 3 months ago (11 children)

ISPs give special preference to speedtest.net, so that their metrics will look better. Which means it rarely reflects actual reality. Theres a good chance this test is closer to the actual speeds you're getting everywhere but on speedtest.net.

[–] skaffi@infosec.pub -2 points 3 months ago

Okay, but I wasn't discussing or quoting you on anything relating to war material. Just your assertion about cargo in general!

Also...

The large cargo ships famously need large amounts of water.

Sounds like you haven't heard about viking cargo ships on logs!

[–] skaffi@infosec.pub -1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Railways are actually super important though. They can transport more cargo than any other means.

Cargo ships would like to have a word with you.

view more: next ›