I believe he was comparing it to a similar broadband grant in a comidic fashion
solidsnail
It doesn't necessarily mean that. It could also be that they attempt to block the rise of new platforms, and by doing so limiting the amount of platforms that they have to compromise.
I think technically what they sell is services related to RHEL and not it itself (correct me if I'm wrong).
To me at least, a big problem with it is the hypocrisy. RHEL started itself by repackaging another piece of software. Why is it not OK for others to do the same to them? Especially when the gpl license allows that, and requires them to allow that!
The Linux license allows anyone to distribute it for profit (under certain conditions). If I wanted to sell CDs with the Linux kernel I could. Wouldn't be a good business, but I could.
Would've never expected this read to be so interesting.
Where's the docstring?
Wdym? Are devs not functional?
Twitter's rate limit changes have led to the death of third-party apps like Apollo
Apollo?
Twitter implemented a rate limit to manage their infrastructure migration to Raspberry Pi
Raspberry pi?
Elon Musk is supposedly fighting against the CIA and NSA, who are using Twitter for censorship
Wha...?
I doubt they run on windows tbh. If they take issue with with monolithic design of Linux, then windows would be an even bigger problem.
Also, most of the devices in question are probably small controllers, incapable of running windows. (Microsoft are struggling to run it on arm so...)
Yeah, didn't get that one either.
That makes sense, and yeah I imagine the problem isn't the entertainment system.
I just don't get the the last paragraph. I don't know if using Linux affects their code being OS or not. If they're just running it on top of Linux and not modifying it, it probably won't be a GPL violation to keep it closed.
Point it out explicitly in your resume. Don't expect them to figure out your github activity on their own.
It's definitely better to have open source experience than no experience.