[-] stewie3128@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 10 months ago

The counter-argument about "the end of human civilization" is so hollow to me. I mean, what benefit does human civilization bring to anyone other than humans? It's a circular argument. There's no inherent need or reason for homo sapiens to continue ad infinitum. We could save literally countless other species by letting the single most destructive one die out.

Now, do I want to actively end the life of myself or anyone I know? Of course not. But at the same time I'm also never, ever having kids.

Much of the developed world is sliding into fascism because of climate change-driven migration. Environmentally, every decade for the foreseeable future will be worse than the one that preceded it. The technology that was supposed to make our lives better and easier is instead used to depress wages, or simply mechanize away jobs.

And all the while, most of those in positions of power - and their most loyal voters - are dead set against a universal basic income, instead opting for ever more oppressive wage slavery, simply because profits have to grow every quarter in spite of their natural tendency to decline.

These trends, along with many others, mean that the average child born in a developed nation today can more often than not expect a lower standard of living than that of their parents. And that pattern has no reason to reverse. The people running the world into oblivion have suckered too many rubes to go along with them via a false sense of cultural solidarity and hostility toward anyone they're told not to like.

The line is going down. It's been going down since the neoliberal turn, and nothing we do will pull it back up at this point. Too many global biophysical and socio-political systems have been broken in a self-reinforcing manner to revive the vitality of this planet as long as we continue to inhabit it. The best I personally can hope for is some global-scale healing to begin a couple hundred years after we're gone.

[-] stewie3128@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 10 months ago

The most worthwhile comparison is of the surface area, excluding crust. Crust quotient must be disregarded.

[-] stewie3128@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago

Then why did they invent stuffed crust?

[-] stewie3128@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 months ago

I wish I could award you with fake Internet points.

[-] stewie3128@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago

2 12" pizzas are 112.5% the surface area of as single 18" pizza.

[-] stewie3128@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago

Pizza place that just opened up down the street from me only offers one size:

18 inches.

The other option is to purchase by the slice.

[-] stewie3128@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 10 months ago

I actually liked it better when it sucked more. I have no idea why. Maybe I identified it as college comfort food.

[-] stewie3128@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago

Well then I guess Penn & Teller's BS series is actually the Dark Side version of Mythbusters.

Loved both of those shows. Learned how to cheat on a polygraph from the Penn & Teller show.

[-] stewie3128@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

Disney has for the last few decades positioned itself as a premium product at a premium price (think the entry costs for theme parks, cruises, etc.) much the same way Apple has. They clearly think their content is worth the premium, so they're going for it.

Also, a lot of their best films are going public domain in the coming years, so they need to maintain and grow their revenue stream somehow.

Shedding ABC, eliminating physical media, and increasing streaming prices makes total sense if you think the way they do.

[-] stewie3128@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

Same. Refi'd into 3% and not going to budge. It'll be interesting to see if our loan servicer ever changes, because who in the world would want to buy a loan with such a low interest rate?

[-] stewie3128@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

Just like any other job, entirely dependent on your particular unit/department and manager. In the US Fed gov't there's a huge difference between working for CBP, civil Marines, and NASA, just to name 3 random agencies.

The difference with the feds is that you get a basically predictable paycheck (as long as Congress does its damn job), health benefits that make life habitable, the best possible version of a 401k around (TSP), and you're extraordinarily unlikely to get downsized.

Last I checked, the plurality of civilian federal employees make GS-13, which in 2023 was between $98k and $153k depending on where you were located, and how long you've been at that pay-grade. It's not an overwhelming plurality, butnit's not unusual to promote into a GS-13, and then hang out there for most of your career.

Retirement is a three-legged stool: your TSP (aka 401k), Social Security, and a small pension. People hired before 1985 were the ones who got the sweet fat pensions, but it doesn't work that way anymore.

view more: next ›

stewie3128

joined 1 year ago