swlabr

Note: the slop in the article preview is Derek smart’s pfp, as he has waded into the comments section. I will not post highlights

also make sure you get a 100% gold buttplug and sleep with it in. that way you always have a stash on you in case the left take over the government and storm your house

I agree, to some extent, but with the caveat that I have second order cynicism that might present as hope or naivete. I think a lot of the messaging from mainstream US politics is that “this is the only way, there is no alternative.” Of course this extends to weaponised foreign aid.

The way that I look at the US (when it is not operating under trump*) is that it is a machine that is trying to maintain and/or grow its hegemony. To that end, the CIA is a vital part of that machine. Is it the centre of foreign policy? Well, barring some sort of conspiracy, no, the US State department is the centre of foreign policy. However, the CIA is categorically the foreign intelligence-gathering arm of the US. As incompetent as I'd like to pretend the US is, I don't think the State Department is operating without CIA intelligence and analysis. In sum, I don't believe that the CIA is a shadowy evil organisation secretly controlling the US; I think the US is a shadowy evil organisation trying to control the world, and the CIA is part of it.

I think the thing that sucks about all this is that, on paper, USAID does good! They provide a ton of aid around the world, and that's great. However, they have enough blemishes on their record that show that the US isn't necessarily purely charitable in its actions. Aid shouldn't be weaponised!

*trump and his goons, of course, are just stripping the US of its copper wiring for a quick fix, while letting the establishment lapdogs deal with the drudgery.

Not defending the US foreign policy, but this is just right-wing propaganda

lol. I got horseshoe theory'd.

It is a organization responsible for foreign aid and development

My mistake! Sorry, Captain America! I will never be cynical about US foreign policy ever again!

This was my X:

My understanding of USAID is that it is primarily a front for CIA operations.

Evidence:

??? You want brain scans?

Shhh my amusement has not run out yet

nah what’s happening here is I am making claim X. Then you go: are you claiming Y? Prove it! And then I go: no. Then you start talking all this shit about covert CIA ops and mafia pizza joints and whatever, showing no signs of understanding that I said X. What choice do I have but to conclude that you are an idiot

Hey, buddy, listen. I'm sorry. I didn't mean it like that. Sorry if I hurt your feelings. I love the CIA. And USAID. Really, I do. Please don't accuse me of ad hominum [sic], that would break my heart. And evidence? Of course, there's no evidence. The US is a perfect little angel; everything it does is moral and good. It's just that big old meanie trump making a mess of things, that's all. Does that make it better?

Well, at this point, you're just being obtuse.

I still don’t get what a non-covert front is.

That's a term you made up, so that's a classic "you problem"!

You said USAID is a front for CIA operations and it isn’t covert when it does these operations. [...] Like I’m picturing a pizza parlor which is a front for a mafia operation, but instead of being covert, it is open. So it says “Mafia’s Pizza” instead of “Tony’s Pizza”. Are you thinking USAID is something like that?

Again, you're the one coming up with this. Stop thinking. You aren't good at it.

Propaganda certainly does exist. I never said that it didn’t.

Great!

I’m disputing that USAID is a CIA operation and not an independent organization with it’s own goals and directives.

Good for you!

I probably just misunderstood what you mean by “front”.

Sure.

I read it as something like a feigned appearance.

That would be the long and short of it.

Maybe I’m just having trouble understanding how a something can be both openly avowed (not covert) and yet non-openly avowed (a front) at the same time.

Definitely don't look up these terms, they might be above your reading level:

• ulterior motives
• chess for the intermediate player
• palace intrigue and scheming eunuchs

I agree with USAID being a tool for soft power.

Great!

So are many things, like Hollywood. Doesn’t mean Hollywood is a CIA operation.

Putting aside the equivocation, that's a lousy counterexample. Are you just going to pretend like propaganda doesn't exist?