Oh i kind of thought you were concerned with ideological expression being culled... but i guess you just want to cuss lmao.
Arent you caving MORE if you use an entirely different word? Omitting a single letter means you express exactly what you intended to but using an entirely different word... holy shit thats like repressing your true self to please corporations... or something... sorry im not good at this.
Why the fuck would that matter lol.
Ideas are being censored by filtering words so if the idea comes across then its the same thing.
Sorry for cursing.
Forget it he ruined it.
Its to avoid being censored actually. I think we get their gist when we are missing one letter. Depends on which platform that determines if it's pointless or not but who cares.
Damn dude we could have gone several levels deeper on this. Did you really have to call me out?
But what if they hire mercenaries to force access to their physical locations?
Seriously though. Just buy a shelf and spend all of your money on anime figurines if you want to collect something that can still contribute micro plastics to the oceans.
Ur all dumb
Lemmy-level comedy
Well here we are. You have taken me seriously and now, with the help of chatgpt, i will respond to you.
ChaptGPT: You should review ethical subjectivism versus ethical objectivism.
Me: How can multiple objective ethical viewpoints exist without proving ethics are subjective? You would have to prove, or substaniate in some way that a certain objective ethical framework stands above others. Seeing as how this remains a popular philosophical debate, im guessing you cant prove that.
ChatGPT: popular ethical frameworks that could be adopted by a person include: denotational ethics, utilitarism, virtue ethics, natural law theory, divine command theory, moral realism, human rights theory, contractualism, objectivism, moral absolutism, pragmatism, rule consequentialism, ethical intuitionism, platonism in ethics, the doctorine of double effect.
Me: if you are saying its a moral choice to adopt an ethical framework, and thats why each of these choices are not subjective in themselves, isnt that kind of obtuse and a semantic argument? Which is exactly what i would expect from a lemming. Because thats the way internet arguments are won.
My friend: Tee is right on this one.
You: Damn man you are right.
Idk i just consider the important ethical questions of life and society and compare it to your disdain for asterisks and wonder why you walk this path. Seems really specific and im not sure who benefits.