Gross. But you're right, denying it just prolonged the news cycle, and creates an incentive for someone to prove it. The guy used to visit a store to masturbate, there's no chance he was careful enough to avoid creating some evidence. He should just ignore the story and try to move passed it.
Doesn't believe in guilt-by-association cancel culture?
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/jd-vance-national-abortion-ban-soros-1235062748/
"No fair using the entirety of what we said to make us look like shitbags!"
The penalty for filming in Arlington is a fine and up to 6 months in jail. Jail time is very unlikely, and there's no indication of what the fine would/should be, but the bad press would be worse than any financial penalty.
Assault is a more serious crime, but the victim would need to cooperate with the prosecution. I don't know if "press charges" is the correct term, but the victim is afraid of retaliation, so I doubt any of it goes anywhere.
Criminals don't expect to get caught.
I really wish the Arlington employee would press charges. I understand why they won't, but it's really disturbing that the campaign and the candidate are lying about what happened.
This felt like a power move by Putin. He wanted to demonstrate his control, so he insisted that Trump make a public overture.
Biden was never going to pass a capital gains tax increase before the election. Dems want to campaign on the issue, and Biden retiring means he can propose all sorts of shit that will make Harris seem reasonable.
28% is still way too low, but if they can tax unrealized gains used as collateral, that would close a massive loophole and bring in far more revenue than a few percentage points on realized gains.
But yes, Harris has indicated that she's a centrist, and there aren't enough progressives in Congress to move the ball forward. Putting Trump behind bars would be enough for me, though.
I got my SoundBlaster from my uncle who upgraded, and I think it was a Gravis. But that was like 30 years ago, so I might be wrong.
Things that are objectively true:
They parroted pro-Putin talking points.
They were paid by Russia.
They claim to be victims of a Russian smear campaign.
How does that even work?
Cheney supported Trump in 93% of her votes, including voting against his first impeachment. She doesn't have principles, she has ambitions.
If this pisses you off, good. Because this is the legal system we have, and it's always been this corrupt. It's always been this unjust, this skewed, and it will continue to be until we demand a change.