[-] thepaperpilot@beehaw.org 9 points 11 months ago

I think they mean in the sense that it's not a native desktop app (or mobile)

[-] thepaperpilot@beehaw.org 19 points 1 year ago

The call to action button is the free plan, with subscribe having a secondary button style. That alone makes it clear they want to show you ads more than they want you to subscribe.

[-] thepaperpilot@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

If you go to very leftist areas of the internet (socialist or communist areas, anywhere from anarchistic (bottom left) to authoritarian (top left)) you'll see people using liberalism by its political science definition, rather than the definition its taken on within American culture. It stems from the idea of capital moving freely (that is, liberally) without restrictions. You'll also see it referred to as neoliberalism in the same spaces.

Full disclosure, I myself am pretty extremely socially libertarian (arguably borderline anarchistic), and have used liberal derogatively myself.

[-] thepaperpilot@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

I'm also still interested in the xmpp vs matrix debate. I'm using matrix ATM because it seems more actively developed and used, but I know some people still swear by xmpp. Ultimately I really just want a decentralized alternative to discord, but beyond that I feel like I'll just want to go to whichever alternative has the most users, since that's pretty useful for chatting software.

I've heard feedback that matrix doesn't seem to be very united, with different groups implementing different competing features proposals etc., which does seem to be a pretty big issue.

I'm also pretty optimistic about a lot of the new stuff being built on matrix. I recently became aware of Commune, which is about making sections of matrix servers web searchable, and that sounds incredible - one of my biggest issues with discord is how often it gets used as effectively game wikis, collecting all these guides and information that's only accessible through a proprietary discord account. No anonymous search.

[-] thepaperpilot@beehaw.org 19 points 1 year ago

The bit about "no" not meaning "no" means they're specifically implying meta employees can be sexually assaulted even if they say no. I'm sure it's said in jest, but it's still a fairly offensive comment.

[-] thepaperpilot@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not ready to really degoogle my phone, but wow next DNS has a lot of cool features! Thanks for the recommendation

[-] thepaperpilot@beehaw.org 36 points 1 year ago

I haven't gotten into vrchat personally, but I love that it's become well known as a good safe place for people to explore their gender identities

[-] thepaperpilot@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure I agree with the take that blahaj.zone has a facism problem. They're explicitly anti-tankie and anti-nazi, which are the authoritarian end of the political spectrum. It's a very left leaning space, and I think anyone in the lower left quadrant, e.g. libertarianism to anarchism and socialism to communism, would be well received.

[-] thepaperpilot@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure why you would need accounts on all those different platforms. Isn't the whole point of posse that you just post it once and then anyone, regardless of platform, can see it? That's what already happens (with the caveat that some, like lemmy, won't show you certain types of posts, like notes).

And people following you on one platform but not another sounds like more of a desire for multiple identities, each one a fragment of your actual identity. That's another concept, that stuff like socialhub try to implement.

[-] thepaperpilot@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure I understand how this isn't already possible. Create an account on some federated platform, such as your own self hosted one, and people from any federated platform can now follow you. Isn't that already POSSE?

[-] thepaperpilot@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago

pixelfed seems to be getting some really nice improvements at an incredible rate. Props to those devs!

[-] thepaperpilot@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you picture the political compass, where the y axis is how how democratic the society is(where the top is tyranny and the bottom is anarchy) and the x axis is how socialized it is (where the left is communism and the right is capitalism), OP claimed that ancap (the bottom right quadrant) doesn't exist, and that those who claim to be ancap tend to be authoritarian right instead. You argued that democracy could exist in a socialist (leftist) society. You are not disagreeing with OP, because what you described is not a capitalist (right leaning) society.

view more: next ›

thepaperpilot

joined 1 year ago