The question was about client trust, which the server doesn’t. If the shot wasn’t possible, it’s not valid and did not happen.

how do you design a server to be “better” if it has to trust data from a remote client?

Because it doesn’t have to.

The linux kernel contains more profanity than this meme…

Ah yes, that’s the difference. Thanks!

But then they’re drinking irradiated water, no?

Unless it’s really easy to remove the radiation safely, this doesn’t seem like the right solution.

[-] unlawfulbooger@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It was new to me too, but a (code) forge is essentially a VCS server with stuff like a wiki and issue tracking. So think GitLab, GoGS/Gitea/Forgejo, BitBucket and all the others.

Even then, there’s probably a better way to solve the problem, instead of a petty “no U”.

597
Misgendering does not rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
1523
Healthcare rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)

Tweet is from around February 2022; I’m not visiting that cesspool to find the exact date.

192
Me watching ENT (lemmy.blahaj.zone)

GIF of Mr. Bean looking for something in a panicked manner with the caption: “me trying to find the remote until the skip intro button disappears”

662
A ruleussy most profound (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
313
1102
Ratchet effect rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
906
Doomscrolling rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
637
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by unlawfulbooger@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/tenforward@lemmy.world
52
186
807
Don't use your rule name (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
1155
view more: next ›

unlawfulbooger

joined 1 year ago