verdigris

Yeah but that's based

Ah right, I remember being caught by that before. Fixed, thanks.

This is currently one of the biggest selling points for the browser, since Chrom(ium) is dropping support for v2... So I don't see that happening.

An actual WM is not a DE, and if you use something like i3 (sway is the Wayland version) all it does is manage your windows. A DE includes a WM; GNOME's is called ~~gdm~~ Mutter. If you install a WM yourself, that's all you get. Docks, bars, etc. might have suggested or sibling implementations for a given WM, but you'll be setting them up yourself and you can easily swap in other options, or just not have them. There's also no included software suite with things like a file manager. You're expected to pick and use whatever tools you like, which is exactly the appeal but can be intimidating if you're used to a full fledged DE.

Tiling is just a way of organizing your windows, as opposed to the more common "floating" scheme that all the major desktop UIs use. You can totally use tiling in a DE, you just need an extension for it. I know they exist for GNOME and I'm sure there's a way to do it on kde too. Even Windows has tiling modes available.

So you can probably just enable tiling on your current setup to try it out (or install GNOME on your VM --i know that PopOS! used to have a built in tiling mode, but it's been years since I tried that so ymmv). Moving to a WM instead of a DE is a very different and more involved process that's mostly for people who want a totally custom setup with no extraneous features that they don't explicitly set up. It's basically the UI side of doing an LFS or classic Arch install where you pick which system components to use by hand.

Yeah, trying to keep it vague and I also only saw the movie once near release.

When people say this they're just talking about the one single moment in the first half of the film, right? The rest of the movie was interesting but idk about scary.

This movie is incredible. The moment when the protagonist climbs through the wall and it turns out to be a mural is permanently imprinted in my mind. I don't know if the pure horror elements work that well, honestly, and I don't really find it that scary as a result, but it's a fantastic and unique movie with a bold vision and strong themes.

Can I ask what scared you about The Exorcist? Assuming you watched it as an adult and are not highly religious; otherwise I get it. I watched it for the first time a few years ago after seeing it regularly called one of the scariest movies of all time -- maybe my expectations were too high but I found it almost comical.

The original is a significantly better film.

It's less about STIs themselves and more about the social stigma of them.

There is a single scene in this movie, involving a door, which makes my skin crawl harder than just about anything I've seen in film. It's also sadly spoiled slightly in one of the trailers, so I'd avoid those, but even if you do see it it's still impactful.

The rest of the movie is a solid 7-8/10 that does a great job of referencing a lot of classic horror.

I think Alien is a great movie (and definitely horror), but whether it scares modern audiences is pretty hit and miss. It's very slow paced and while I love the practical effects, the alien looks downright goofy in some scenes. I certainly don't find it scary having seen it, and new viewers I've shown it to usually aren't that scared unless they're self-identified wimps when it comes to horror. Aliens is scarier I think, even though it's more action than pure horror.

Same goes 10x for The Exorcist. It tops a lot of "scariest movie ever" lists online, but watching it today is more comical than anything. I think you have to be scared of demonic possession actually happening IRL to get scared by that movie.