whofearsthenight

joined 1 year ago

This is my bet as well. I think at some point, foldable screens will get good enough to get mass market, and then it will be about how thin/light they can make those so they get bigger screens but the device remains pocketable. Not to mention, screen tech matches/exceeds today. That's the practical appeal of things like holos outside of just being aesthetically "future looking."

I'm also very interested in the idea of AR glasses that can be worn normally, but that's pretty limited by physics right now (battery and camera tech especially.)

[–] whofearsthenight@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lol, I guess I should have led with "extremely, profoundly ignorant in a way that almost has to be a choice at this point” for all of the reading comprehension in this post.

Aside from the fact that I am far more left than the democratic party and your base assumption about me and the point of my post is woefully far off, I would really love some answer to a very basic question:

What has the effect been for left/progressive policy from sitting out elections or voting for third party/independents?

While left/progressives sit over here and go "oh I don't like this candidate because they voted for this policy in '92 that was bad for beluga whales" the right will line up and dutifully vote for a rapist that tried to overthrow democracy as long as they have an R next to their name.

But yeah, vote your principles! Go out there and vote for the green candidate! After all, look at how well that went towards advancing green principles - The party promotes green politics, specifically environmentalism; nonviolence; social justice; participatory democracy; grassroots democracy; anti-war; anti-racism; libertarian socialism and eco-socialism. All that got so much better thanks to the idealists who thought Hillary was a little too corporate or had a little too much resting bitch face.

[–] whofearsthenight@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Most (if not all?) of the *arrs can use torrents. edit: as for guides, i would just check out yams.media.

Yes and no. I think it would be decently socially unacceptable for someone to decide to go completely dark for a day each week. A mandate would remove the stigma.

But, like... so? It's decently socially unacceptable to dress up like Batman and walk around town shouting for the Joker. But you can still do it, and just because it's socially unacceptable to most doesn't mean we should force it on most.

On a helpful side because I do generally agree with the premise (although with lots of caveats) that unplugging a bit is helpful, I have a few thoughts:

If you're on iOS, use Focus modes. If you're on Android, I'm sure there is some equivalent. I have my paid work hours, and then I have "working hours" (I'm salaried, if you're hourly I'd say throw your phone in a faraday cage if you aren't getting paid for it) where I reduce comms. Email is on during paid hours, but probably off during "working hours" except VIPs and a few keywords. Messaging stays on during working hours, but after go off. Subordinates know phone calls for emergency (which are rare.) This is one thing I don't like about the US not settling on a messaging standard - for all of the other iOS using people, they can see when I have a notifications are off, and know when to escalate comms if they really need help. Android not so much.

For work, set boundaries in contracts and what not. If the cultural norm is you're going to be expected to be at your phone 24/7 and it's not paid for and not something you're okay with, either ignore it and let them try to fire you, or realistically just find a new job because that's a shit culture.

For personal, just do whatever the fuck you want. I don't even try to justify it any longer because it's just not reasonable, and if someone really has a problem that I didn't like their post or respond to their text in 0.3 seconds, maybe I don't really care that much they're not my friend?

Also, I generally find that a lot of the expectation that we're always "on" is self-inflicted. I know plenty of people who sending a text message to might be as effective as sending a smoke signal and it just isn't that big a deal? I used to be one of those "I have to answer every message/email/post in 30s" type of people, and when I stopped doing that it was totally fine, except I was far less stressed. And it virtually never led to anything positive. My boss never pulled me aside and said "fastest emailer in the west, here's a 20% raise." I just set the expectation for those around me that my time wasn't important and I was always going to be at someone's beck and call.

[–] whofearsthenight@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, or feel free to call it the sabbath because forcing people to do things based on a hunch or personal opinion is totally religiosity in a nutshell.

And if we don't just cherry pick one thing and instead look at the litany of health issues that may be self-inflicted in medical professions, we probably wouldn't be left with many doctors/nurses.

You know, I didn't even think of this. I initially just thought "good, they might get a queer kid they'll abuse/neglect and thus shouldn't have them" but the whole limiting of the expansion of more shitbirds sure is a nice bonus.

[–] whofearsthenight@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I came here to say similar. macOS > all for me. I personally generally detest Windows, but I keep an install around because I want to game and don't want getting my games to run to be a hobby. I'd much rather do most productivity types of things on Linux rather than Windows. That said, I'm far and away most productive on macOS, and the tooling there is just better for me for most things, especially given that I use an iPhone as my mobile. Just the integrations between those two would make switching either one hard, especially given it's not nearly as good on any other platform. But honestly, even trying to use a computer without Keyboard Maestro and Launchbar just feel straight up broken to me now.

Also, people downvoting in this thread maybe didn't read the question? "Which do you prefer?"

That looks cool. I’m solid with yams right now but I’m going to bookmark that in case I need to change.

[–] whofearsthenight@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I don't think they are under-estimating, or even close. It's like taking a solid b student and grading them next to the kid eating paint chips and torturing small animals and pretending it's the same. Even in modern times, look at economic accomplishments of this admin, legislative accomplishments, etc. Fighting for things like a higher min wage (though it failed.)

Stop blaming people for not voting for them.

Fuck no. Every time in my life we've voted in Republicans it's led to one catastrophe or another. Sure you can make an argument that Dems need to be pushed to the left, but the choices are between:

a) the party who isn't improving your life fast enough
b) the party these days that are literal fascists responsible for multiple financial collapses at this point, millions dead from wars they start, failure to manage a pandemic, extreme wealth concentration, that is looking at our planet on fire and still doesn't meaningfully acknowledge that our policy is causing it. Book bans, loss of bodily autonomy for half of the country, destroying education, ensuring discrimination in law, bringing back child labor.

If you're voting republican in 2023 or not voting democrat, you're a sociopath, billionaire (whoops said the same thing twice), or a fucking moron*. There is no path to a more progressive country that comes through allowing fascists to burn it all down.

* I suppose I could more charitably say "extremely, profoundly ignorant in a way that almost has to be a choice at this point."

They seem to want to be obstinate, so while I don't agree, I'll take a stab at answering the question:

The link they posted has this bit right at the top:

You may have paid money to get copies of a free program, or you may have obtained copies at no charge. But regardless of how you got your copies, you always have the freedom to copy and change the software, even to sell copies.

The fundamental belief seems to be that however you obtained the software, paid or not, you should be free to do literally whatever you want with it.

Where I really disagree is that proprietary software (like half of the answers in this fucking thread lol) are fundamentally not scams. A "scam" implies something that one party, the patsy, is not aware of.

[–] whofearsthenight@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I'm not sure what point you're trying to make. A 20-30% jump in a grocery bill is unprecedented in my life time. I'm skeptical it's even that low for most. Pre-pandemic, I was buying eggs for 1.39, they're 2.49 now. Jarred spaghetti sauce used to be 1.99, it's 3.49 now if I catch a sale. I used to be able to regularly buy chicken breast for like 1.49-1.99, now if it's less than 3 I buy as much as I can afford and freeze it. This time of year in my area, corn would usually be on sale 4/$1. The cheapest it's gotten is $0.79.

Just repeat ad nauseam for everything. The other day I was in the store thinking to myself, "I'm not sure I can afford convenience foods like canned beans." Canned. Fucking. Beans. The luxury.

view more: next ›