xJREB

joined 1 year ago
[–] xJREB@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (4 children)

But who would lead the executive branch then and how would you ensure that they are reasonably separated from the legislative branch?

[–] xJREB@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Haha, I was actually joking, I didn't think it's really true. This is hilarious!

[–] xJREB@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Maybe they're talking about themselves in 3rd person (dragonfucker)? 🙃

[–] xJREB@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago

I recently read an interesting article proposing to get rid of the current peer review system: https://www.experimental-history.com/p/the-rise-and-fall-of-peer-review

The argument was roughly this: for the unfathomable (unpaid) hours spent on peer review, it's not very effective. Too much bad research still gets published and too much good research gets rejected. Science would also not be a weak-link problem but a strong-link problem, i.e., scientific progress would not depend on the quality of our worst research but of that of our best research (which would push through anyway in time). Pretty interesting read, even though I find it difficult to imagine how we would transition to such a system.

[–] xJREB@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If I remember correctly, this is also one of the leading explanations why the Pennsylvania Dutch are called like that even though they speak German (or a German dialect).

[–] xJREB@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

Wow, these guys are even more awesome than I thought then...

[–] xJREB@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Is Google Chrome fighting uBlock country-specific? I use Chrome on Win 10 with uBlock and haven't seen a YouTube ad outside of the mobile app in ages. For me, uBlock never stopped working in Chrome and I watch YouTube videos every 1-2 days.

[–] xJREB@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

An axiom is a statement that is accepted to be true, usually to serve as a foundation for further arguments. I assume OP meant that NGT would often make general statements without much justification and OP perceived these statements as not nuanced / "true" enough.

[–] xJREB@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

A few bad things in code for which we have fairly consistent evidence:

  • high nesting depth
  • meaningless or single-letter variable names
  • lots of code duplication
  • very inconsistent formatting
  • very complicated Boolean conditions with AND and OR
  • functions with a lot of parameters
[–] xJREB@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago (2 children)

As a software engineering researcher, I strongly agree. SE research has studied code comprehension for more than 40 years, but for that amount of time, we know surprisingly little about what makes really high-quality code. We are decent in saying what makes very bad code, though, but beyond extreme cases, it's hard to come to fairly general statements.

[–] xJREB@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

That's a great analogy via movie quotes if I've ever seen one! Need to rewatch that movie... :)

[–] xJREB@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm confused about this as well. Why is this trial happening before one that would bring criminal charges for the insurrection to lock him up? If he lost such a trial, he would be automatically banned from running, right? Or is the required evidence different for this one and that's why they go with it?

view more: next ›