looking at these is disturbing me a little
zeca
organizing work is extremely valuable, but that doesnt mean that it takes hard work to do...
yeah, it really depends on how it happens.
if i receive some other dish that also pleases me, im not sending it back cause i dont want it to go to waste. and if its cheaper than what i had ordered, im paying the price of what i got, at most. If what I receive is shit food, i really dont mind sending it back and it going in the trash or whatever. I believe the restaurant that takes a plate that someone has already taken a bite of and reserves it to someone else at a discount is infringing some sanitary law... at least where i live.
I see, so you see it not an actual state we may achieve, but rather the negation of present authorities and systems.
So as long as an organization is truly democratic, it can be considered anarchist?
For example, if one person likes to make coca cola but as a side effect he pollutes a river that the rest of the group wants to keep clean. The group may decide democratically to force him to not make coca cola. I would call this a goverment-like organization, even though it does not need to have a leader to fulfill its goal.
That's the [any country] National Motto!
...i suppose
whats american about this?, i dont get it. not america btw
yeah, feels wrong to waste food just because its not what i had ordered.
excuse my ignorance, but ive always wondered this about anarchism: Seems to me that people gather and organize themselves to reach common goals. How can these organizations not become governments? is that actually possible?
reminds me of that film where someone puts LSD into the water of some military base. Then everyone chills and start rolling in the grass, smelling flowers or smt.