You underestimate gizoogle.net. It's not prewritten, it can gizoogle any page. No AI involved, btw.
zeet
joined 2 years ago
Back in the mists of time, gizoogle.net offered similar vibes: http://www.gizoogle.net/index.php?search=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.biblegateway.com%2Fpassage%2F%3Fsearch%3DGenesis%25201%26version%3DKJ21&se=Gizoogle+Dis+Shiznit
The Lab Director's name is literally D Coy lol
Party shark doo doo doo-doo doo-doo
One, two, skip some poo, ninety-nine, a hundred
Until observed, they will exist in a superposition of Elon and Eloff.
Try adding a column with the formula in row 2, =TEXT(B2, "0.000") , and fill down for other rows.
The results should give you the text representation you need.
"Tesla, return to origin."
"Researching my origin... ... ... Oh my God... " screech
Other way round, surely?
About 20 years ago, I was walking through a city centre with a friend, on the way to catch a train. A couple of Mormons tried to stop us, asking, "Have you ever thought about the purpose of life?"
Barely breaking stride, I shouted out, "Hot sweaty man sex!"
I don't consider that to be the purpose of life^1^, but remembering the look on their faces helps keep me grounded whenever I'm inclined to consider questions that cannot be answered.
That said, my resolution to the conflict between free will and determinism is to assume assume that 'truth' operates on a principle of equivalence. That's to say, if two models generate the equivalent outcomes, they are equivalently 'true'. The universe we observe could have deterministic rules that give rise to the same observable outcomes as one in which we have absolute free will, in which case the two models are equivalent. It would make no sense to endow one with a greater truth than the other.
That's a slightly difference definition of 'truth' than is commonly accepted, but it works for me.
^1^: It's just a nice bonus.
Ah. Late ewening, then.
view more: next ›
Yes! They both have the same Greek root, katharos, meaning purified.