That’s right. It is just unnecessary to mention Signal at all in this case, as it might cause confusion.
zr0
All good. It’s just an unnecessary punch against Signal. Especially journalist rely heavily on it, so I don’t know what the intention was with this title.
And where exactly do you see “Signal security failure” in the quoted text?
Sure sure. Oh. About the quotes. Do you mind sharing a screenshot of the quotes you are talking about?
Tell me you are dense, without telling me you are dense. You can’t make this shit up 🤣
Came here to say this. The display has a resolution of 2880 x 1800 pixels. And this “journalist” tells me, that it looks good with a configured resolution of 1920 x 1080. Tells a lot about the quality of this review.
There are no quotes. So it is not something Trump said. It was interpreted by the author of the news story.
Have my upvote. Because my view is the same. The title included a quote, which is even marked as a quote. However, “Signal security failure” is without quotes. So the author just chose to unnecessarily blame Signal, instead of the real issue.
Disagree. Wir lieben das Einschlafen. Das schlafen selbst nehmen wir leider nicht wahr. Das Aufwachen ist dann meist die Hölle.
What’s up, buddy? Why the sudden silence? Or did you finally realize that “Signal security failure” was never something someone said and it was actually just something the author came up with?