548
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech to c/childfree@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Zorque@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

Wouldn't this be prime age for boomers to be great grandparents? Unless they mean paying for their grandkids college...

[-] neblem@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Boomers are 1946-1964. Definitely the older in the generation are in the great grandparent years, especially if they and their kids had kids young, but the younger boomers, especially if they and their kids had their first kids later, will be grandparents.

[-] Zorque@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

I wouldn't exactly call that prime time for them to be grandparents, then...

[-] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 weeks ago

if they had kids at 30 their kids could have kids at 30.

[-] Zorque@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

"If" is doing a lot of heavy lifting.

And that's still just for the youngest of that generation, not the whole of it... I don't know about you, but I'd hardly call a minority of a minority "prime".

this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
548 points (95.2% liked)

childfree

2007 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS