Asklemmy

44149 readers

1272 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

133

If you could only have 1GB of entertainment data, what would it be? (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

121 comments fedilink hide all child comments

You are going away, to some place isolated... in space, of course. You will only be around one other person. You can take an allotment if 1GB of personal media with you (text, video, music, games, pics, etc.) that you will be able to access in your free time indefinitely at will.

The other person will also take 1GB with them, but you won't be able to talk to them until you're on the journey.

You will have access to any knowledge resources to perform your function and keep you alive. You will never return to a point where you can get new external media. Any additional media you ever access would have to be created by you and or your travel partner with what you have access to.

You will also not know the sex of your partner, but they have willingly taken the same risks to embark on the journey as yourself, and will have a similar mission.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] tonyn@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

No .. that's 4k not 4kb

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Seems you didn't read the description. The executable that produced that output was 4 kilobytes in size.

[–] Takumidesh@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It's 4kb it's the demo scene.

To expand, the rendered to video output is much more than 4k, but the file that produces the output can be small like that, this is usually done by doing a bunch of math to generate the output dynamically.

You can kind of equate it to how a video game can generate 120 frames of 4k footage every second indefinitely, but the game itself is limited in size.

Recording the output takes up space, but you don't need to record it if you can generate it in demand.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

No it is 4kb.

Thanks for incorrecting me.