this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
441 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

60021 readers
4136 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Would it make the internet better? Probably.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zeshade@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

As far as I know Google and Bing return AI results just above the usual web page results.

In addition AI LLM tools like Copilot (the mobile app) and Perplexity which cite their sources with links to websites really make it easier to weed out the BS from LLM answers, if you use them carefully. In my case, these tools replace search engines in 80% of the searches that I do.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The more I run searches on Google and queries through copilot the more my trust evolves.

I use the one latched into Skype more, though.

[–] Zeshade@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

The one in Skype works quite well and is usually not blocked by companies firewalls... Or so I've heard...

[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

If you're following citations, may as well just search for the citations themselves... aka just a regular search engine.

[–] Zeshade@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Yes but the power of it is that you can in effect refine your search using natural language, like talking to a person, as it remembers the last 2-3 exchanges.

And it presents the information the way you asked to see it.

For example (my side of the "conversation"):

  • What is hamas?
  • Compared to Hezbollah?
  • what are the differences between Shia and Sunni?

The citations confirm the information, they are not the end goal. The added value is the fact that the information is pre-digested and presented in a way that matches my learning process. It's a lot easier for me to assimilate information by getting answers to questions that I've asked.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 2 months ago

Yeah, if search hadn't become dog shit I'd be happy with it

Instead, everything is a video for some reason, and the results are purposely worse than a year ago...I don't want to watch a video, I can read 20x faster than I can listen, I don't want to read an ad in article form - I'm generally looking for one little nugget of information

I took this into my own hands - I'll use free services if they work, but increasingly they're just demos for a product that may or may not be better. So I spun up a searx container, I point a local LLM at it, and I let it filter read through results. My next stage is to crawl documentation, use LLMs to feed it into a vector db, and use AI to retrieve exactly what I want without sifting through garbage myself