this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
107 points (97.3% liked)

Interesting Global News

2798 readers
536 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And, as usual, those opera tickets are taxpayer-subsidised with €200-300 per ticket. That is the normal going rate for opera houses in Germany. The guests only pay €20-50.

Worst case of opera subsidies in Germany will be Cologne - they are currently renovating the opera house. It should have been finished ten years ago for 250M€, now they hope to finish renovating next year, for a whopping total of 1.5B€. All paid for by the tax payer. Which, if distributed over 30 years means that each ticket is taxpayer-subsidised with €300-400 just for the cost of the renovation of the house.

[–] kata1yst@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

So what you're saying is, such renovations obviously could only take place with government tax dollars, since as a private enterprise there's no way they could make it work? And this relatively small amount of spending in the grand scheme of the tax system helps keep the local arts flourishing?

Sounds like the tax system is working!

Edit: forgot to add, it also supports the construction workers, restoration workers, the places of business where materials were sourced, pumps money into the local economy, and preserves the buildings as cultural landmarks.

[–] Zos_Kia@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But what if that money goes to art I don't personally like?

[–] kata1yst@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Oh no no, don't worry. Your pennies only paid for the art you like, other people paid for that weird stuff. That's the best part of money, once you throw it all in a pile Scrooge McDuck style, it all looks the same!

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And this relatively small amount of spending

This money is not provided by the federal government, or even the state. It is paid for by the city of Cologne.

1.5B€ is quite a burden on the finances of a city. Even if it is a large city. All for the benefit of a small elite, as normal people don't watch operas.

[–] kata1yst@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The cost was spread over several years. And at 25€ a ticket this doesn't just serve the elite. The building is also a cultural landmark, so preserving it is of social interest, and the money spent went straight back into the local economy, where it was swiftly taxed again.

These arguments are lazy, find better ones.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And at 25€ a ticket this doesn’t just serve the elite.

Have you ever seen the people who go into the opera?

The cost was spread over several years.

Yes, if you would spread it over 30 years, it would still be €300-400 per ticket.

Find better excuses for wasting taxpayers money on a handful of peoples entertainment.

[–] ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That a private enterprise wouldn't be able to make this work should give us a hint that it doesn't benefit enough people for it to be worthwhile, opera is a luxury good consumed by relatively few, relatively affluent people. Why should the taxpayer subsidize their hobby? Actors don't need a billion dollar opera house to perform, they could do it in a school auditorium if necessary. Those tax dollars could have been spent on any number of other things like healthcare and education.

[–] kata1yst@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

When the tickets are only €25 it's not just for the rich. The opera house is a cultural landmark, preserving it serves the public. And it was 1.5B spread over several years, not all at once.

Honestly, the 'money on art bad' argument is not a good line here.

Making it cheaper doesn't change people's taste, it's still mostly for the rich, now they're just getting a subsidy they didn't need from the taxpayer. If people want to spend their money on art that's perfectly fine, what I'm objecting to is the taxpayer being obligated to do so.