The obvious fact is that China is a socialist country led by a communist party, and every serious analysis clearly shows that this is the case. Meanwhile, even the revisionist Soviet Unions was a far superior system to what we have in the west today.

Finally, the fact that there is vibrant political debate in China isn't some gotcha. It's an evolving social system and people are figuring things out as they go. That's how real life works.

Using “the Chinese” as some imaginary ideological monolith of enlightened Marxists who agree and are willfully collaborating is fantasy to the point of Orientalism.

That's a really cute straw man that has nothing to do with anything I said. What's actually being said to you is that people living in a socialist country understand how to apply socialism in practice than western LARPers.

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Meanwhile, even the revisionist Soviet Unions was a far superior system to what we have in the west today.

Hey, if you'll bite the bullet that China's revisionist, I won't have further objections. I never said they were inferior or even merely equal to America, they are clearly superior and a historically progressive force in the world. We agree on that part, it's just not what I was arguing

Finally, the fact that there is vibrant political debate in China isn't some gotcha. It's an evolving social system and people are figuring things out as they go. That's how real life works.

You are leaving out of this "vibrant political debate" that a broad side of it is getting repressed.

What's actually being said to you is that people living in a socialist country understand how to apply socialism in practice than western LARPers.

As you have phrased it, this is a circular argument.

"China is revisionist"

"No, it is socialist"

"How do you know?"

"Because the Chinese [who aren't being repressed] know better and they say so"

"How do they know better?"

"Because they live in a socialist state."

"How do you know?"

"Because the Chinese know better and . . ."

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hey, if you’ll bite the bullet that China’s revisionist, I won’t have further objections. I never said they were inferior or even merely equal to America, they are clearly superior and a historically progressive force in the world. We agree on that part, it’s just not what I was arguing

No, I don't think China is revisionist. What China is doing is precisely what Lenin advocated with programs like NEP.

You are leaving out of this “vibrant political debate” that a broad side of it is getting repressed.

You keep saying that despite all evidence to the contrary.

And I see you continue to make straw man arguments instead of engaging with what I'm actually saying. Your claim that the Chinese are being repressed has zero basis in reality. So, you just made up an absurd claim then based your whole argument on it.

It's pretty obvious that you're just going to keep repeating the same line over and over here, so I don't think further discussion is going to be productive. Bye.

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You keep saying that despite all evidence to the contrary.

Literally the fucking article you linked says that those Maoists are being repressed, that's what the article is all about!

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh the goal posts are now moving from Marxists being repressed to ultras being repressed.

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What was the point of linking the article if the Maoists in it are not legitimate Marxists? Did you get your links mixed up or something, and you meant to link some unrelated article?

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The article discusses other things which you ignored since they don't fit with the narrative you want to craft here. Why are you like this?

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It's the main subject of the article! The whole thing is about the Jasic labor movement with other elements added in as context or because the liberal author has some ax to grind. It's not some sinister slight of hand that I took a link that you gave no specific commentary for and understood you to want me to see what the article is about. It's a big-ass article, which part were you hoping I'd know was what you wanted me to see?

Edit: Removed an incorrect tangent

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes, it's a big article which allows you to cherry pick the parts that fit with the narrative you're peddling here. However, both articles show that Marxism is alive and well in China and it's very much being taught to the masses. The fact that you keep trying to pretend otherwise is frankly clownish in the extreme.

In any case, it's very obviously we're not going to convince each other of anything here. So, I'm going to leave it at that. You can keep believing whatever you like about China, it's not going to affect reality in any way.

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So when I talk about Maoists in an article titled:

The Interwining of Knowledge, Affect, Life, and Mentality: Chinese Youths’ Turn to Marxist-Leninist-Maoist in Contemporary China

I'm cherry-picking

When I talk about the Jasic labor movement in an article that opens and closes talking about the Jasic labor movement and says "Jasic" no less than 142 times, I'm cherry-picking

I could actually cherry-pick and point to the non-negligible number of paragraphs like these:

spoiler

(3) The structural problems of China’s economic development and the expansion of universities have limited economic, cultural, and social upward mobility for young adults [15]. As having a bachelor’s degree can no longer guarantee a middle-class life, students and young graduates are more likely to understand the situation of blue-collar and migrant workers, and hence to comprehend the contradictions within China’s political economy. Consequently, leftist theories with a political-economic critique become more appealing to them.

(4) In the 2010s, after China had gained more global power, an overall upward atmosphere nurtured a stronger nationalist sentiment. “China model” (中國模式) and “Chinese path to modernization” were proposed. This term refers to a competition between “socialism with Chinese characteristics” and Western modernity, and suggests that the “China model” is a better path to achieve modernity. However, the “China model” is based on the exploitation of millions of migrant workers. For young individuals concerned about labor issues, this model is highly detrimental and undesirable, as it legitimizes oppression, exploitation, authoritarianism, and state capitalism.

But I told you much earlier that I can identify when a liberal is writing a hitpiece on China and don't put much stock in these statements (don't get me started on the "Stalinism" part)

You don't need to search to find "The CCP is repressing X group" because the author says it constantly! And I don't even support the idea that all of those times are justified, to say nothing of all the other ridiculous negative views it gives air to, like some describing the CCP as "fascist".

I can't make a definitive statement, but from the evidence given, you are deeply unwilling or unable to engage with someone who doesn't immediately roll over and say "educate me!" but instead just has another view. You are so incredibly obstinate that I couldn't even get you to show me where in this article it says what you want me to read, and so when I come back saying "Wait, the people this article is written about aren't doing so well" you cry that I'm acting in bad faith!

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 month ago

I'm deeply unwilling to engage the same tired tropes. Nothing you've said is original in any way, and all these arguments have been rehashed a million times at this point. Having read actual books on the subject, and having talked to people from China, I've made up my view on how China is developing. Clearly your view is pretty different, and I frankly have no idea how much effort you've put into actually understanding how socialism in China is developing, but I simply don't see any point continuing this discussion. If you think China is revisionist then have fun with that.