this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2024
76 points (100.0% liked)

Labour

7737 readers
21 users here now

One big comm for one big union! Post union / labour related news, memes, questions, guides, etc.

Here Are Some Resources to help with organizing and direct action

:red-fist:

And More to Come!

If you want to speak to a union organizer, reach out here.

:iww: :big-bill: :sabo:

Rules:

  1. Follow The Hexbear Code of Conduct.

  2. No anti-union content, especially from the right. Critiques and discussions of different organizing strategies is fine.

  3. Don’t dox yourself or others.

  4. Labour Party content goes in !electoralism@www.hexbear.net, !politics@www.hexbear.net, or a :dumpster-fire:.

When we fight we win!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

On this day in 1898, the Battle of Virden began when armed members of the United Mine Workers of America (UMW) surrounded a train full of strikebreakers and exchanged fire with company guards. 13 people were killed, dozens more wounded.

After a local chapter of the UMW began striking at a mine in Virden, Illinois, the Chicago-Virden Coal Company hired black strikebreakers from Birmingham, Alabama and shipped them to Virden by train.

The company hired armed detectives or security guards to accompany the strikebreakers, and an armed conflict broke out when armed miners surrounded the train as it arrived in town. A total of four detectives and seven striking mine workers were killed, with five guards, thirty miners, and an unrecorded number of strikebreakers wounded.

After this incident, Illinois Governor John Tanner ordered the National Guard to prevent any more strikebreakers from coming into the state by force. The next month, the Chicago-Virden Coal Company relented and allowed the unionization of its workers.

"When the last call comes for me to take my final rest, will the miners see that I get a resting place in the same clay that shelters the miners who gave up their lives on the hills of Virden, Illinois...They are responsible for Illinois being the best organized labor state in America."

Mother Jones

Megathreads and spaces to hang out:

reminders:

  • πŸ’š You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • πŸ’™ Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • πŸ’œ Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
  • 🐢 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CocteauChameleons@hexbear.net 14 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Imo drinking a couple brews at night is healthier than ice cream and cake prove me wrong

[–] Wakmrow@hexbear.net 10 points 1 month ago
[–] SoylentSnake@hexbear.net 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

grillman ain't a nutritionist but i know i more immediately feel like shit and piss after eating junk food for way less reward vs having a few cold ones grillman

[–] Frank@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago

A big part of that can be your stomach being mad it didn't get what it wanted. I find that if I haven't gotten a good amount of protein and scarf down a lot of sugar I'll feel like shit, but on a day where I've had a good variety in my diet and got sufficient protein then junk food doesn't bother me.

There's also a strong social and cultural component where eating "junk food" is tied towards all kinds of self-worth stuff. Junk food is culturally coded as evidence of weakness and poor character while beer, in moderation, is considered social, fun, and to some degree masculine in a positive sense.

[–] MF_COOM@hexbear.net 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I mean unless you're having an extremely small amount of ice cream and cake isn't this fairly uncontroversial?

[–] Frank@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Might not be controversial but it's almost certainly wrong. Alcohol is an outright poison at any amount. Sugar might cause diabetes and high cholesterol intake will contribute to heart and circulatory disease, but it isn't inherently poisonous and does not cause the wide range of harms that alcohol does.

[–] MF_COOM@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago

I mean, that's not really meaningful to say alcohol is a poison at any amount - whether something is a poison or not is an intrinsic property. By this logic even a nanoliter of ethanol once in your life is worse than a lifetime of eating nothing but cake.

And FWIW high cholesterol, diabetes, heart and circulatory disease do cause a wide range of harms with a substantial body count.