1254
Clarification please (vegantheoryclub.org)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 34 points 19 hours ago

"their ancestors"

The first Jews to move to Palestine were European Jews, they can't use the "our ancestors" card.

[-] IceBerg@lemmy.world 12 points 17 hours ago

Dude, jews have been living in israel all throughout history. They've been forcefully expelled from the country by the various empires which have conquered it but there has always been a jewish presence in the land. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_and_Judaism_in_the_Land_of_Israel

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

And there wasn't a problem until the Europeans came and decided to fuck the place up.

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 17 hours ago

Yes, there have been palestinians practicing judaism for a long time.

But that doesn't give europeans (and africans and asians and others), regardless of their religion, the right to steal the land and genocide the people.

In the olde days they called them crusades and they were garbage then too.

[-] IceBerg@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

When you say steal land and genocide people, are you referring to the survivors from the Holocaust granted part of the british controlled land called (by the british BTW and not the indigenous people) Palestine? Those folks who we're then immediately set upon by the arabic folk living in said land?

[-] bad_news@lemmy.billiam.net 3 points 14 hours ago

"Always" when semitic monotheism didn't exist before the 6th century BCE? When do you think the world was created?

[-] Talaraine@fedia.io -1 points 16 hours ago

The fallacy of this never ending debate is kinda displayed when there's stories in the bible where God tells the Jews to displace the Canaanites and take their land.

Can we just, not?

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

See my reply to someone else, the Jews that moved to Israel after WW2 were Jews of European origin.

[-] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago

I don't understand. They're talking about Biblical era ancestors

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 29 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

DNA tests show that their ancestors mostly have the same markers found in southern Italian or Sicilian populations.

If a Japanese converts to Judaism, can they claim that their ancestors used to live in Israel? Well, the same logic applies to the European Jews that moved to Israel. They then convinced Jews that are actual descendants of the Levant populations to move to Israel with them, but the first settlers didn't have Israeli ancestors, or didn't have more of them than any other Joe Schmo from Southern Italy

[-] drolex@sopuli.xyz 4 points 18 hours ago

Judaism is - mostly - not a religion of conversion, that's why it's always complicated to separate the religious aspect from the ethnic side when talking about 'Jews'.

Even if the ancestry is muddled in millennia of mixing with other local populations, I suppose most Jews can still claim that they descend from Israeli ancestors at some point, and it makes sense.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 9 points 17 hours ago

By this logic anyone can claim their right to seize African land

[-] drolex@sopuli.xyz 8 points 16 hours ago

Or understand that remote ancestry doesn't necessarily give you a right to some land

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 5 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Ding ding ding! Right answer!

Although I'll be the first to admit that what happened to first Nations and indigenous populations during modern colonization is completely unfair and the reservations system is completely broken and it's recent enough that it's perfectly fair for them to fight it, but claiming you're owed a piece of land because your ancestors (allegedly) got kicked out millennias ago? Nah.

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

At least they have a reservation system.

Native Americans south of the us-mexico border stop being native Americans once they move out of the ejidos (aka communal community and the closest thing to a reservation in Mexico) and the ultra fine gradient that separates a Mexican from a native American is too fine for the American and Canadian systems to handle.

It's especially galling in my situation because DNA says I'm 75% native American but I didn't qualify under the American system (Canadians have a similar system) which means I can never access to the healthcare, education, and housing aid due to the simple fact that Americans genocides the people I descend from them out of existence on the American side the border; but left them mostly alone on the Mexican side of the border.

[-] PanArab@lemm.ee 3 points 17 hours ago
[-] drolex@sopuli.xyz 3 points 16 hours ago

Compared to other religions, conversion to Judaism is quite complex and sometimes not allowed at all. The proselyte culture is a lot less developed than for other monotheistic religions.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conversion_to_Judaism

[-] PanArab@lemm.ee 2 points 16 hours ago

Yet the Edomites were forcefully converted to Judaism in the 2nd century BCE https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-edomites

It is a religion with converts even if they are pickier about who is converted, and being the oldest of the Abrahamic religions its converts go back millennia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_converts_to_Judaism

with modern converts even stirring debate over their right to "return": https://www.haaretz.com/jewish/2013-02-19/ty-article/.premium/peruvian-converts-denied-aliyah/0000017f-f79e-d887-a7ff-fffea6480000

[-] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

Yeah, I'd be inclined to agree with your last point too. Especially when you consider the Holocaust, and how the Jews were forced to relocate or die. It's like what do you want them to do in that situation.

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

It’s like what do you want them to do in that situation.

I want them not to steal the land and genocide the people who are completely unconnected to the holocaust. Zionism was a form of fascism before WW2. It's always been the plan to rob palestine (apart from when they wanted argentina, etc.).

[-] glockenspiel@programming.dev -1 points 9 hours ago

Are you aware of the history of the state of Israel beyond what affirms a bias? The modern state of Israel was formed after Jews around the world started purchasing land in modern day Israel. 28% of Israel was purchased this way, and that's most of the land the original waves moved to. Arab states surrounding that 28% had a huge issue with Jews existing in that space considering every one of those nations had genocide the Jews from their borders and even aligned with Hitler during WW2 (including the Palestinians, who allied with Hitler and whose leaders were eventually sent into exile by the British for doing so).

So, because the Arab states already had designs on the area of Palestine (they were going to annex once the British left), and they couldn't tolerate Jews existing in the area... The Arab nations attacked. And lost, soundly. And Israel grew much, much larger. Israel seized more land by fighting off a war than anywhere else. That's what happens when countries lose wars of aggression which they start; they lose territory. That's what Ukraine is doing to Russia right now and they'd be foolish to ever give it back.

But sometimes they do give some or all land back. Which Israel did. They gave a lot of the land back in exchange for peace.

There's no perfect entity in the world, and definitely not one in the Middle East. But please, spare us the Boogeyman one sided tales. The Jews fought for Israel so adamantly because they were exterminated from the region long before any fascist rose to power in Germany. They were forced out into diaspora several times, too. It's all complicated and unfair and it isn't as simple as Jews = European and don't belong there.

Palestinians need to bite the bullet. There are generations of people born there now and Arab states are not going to exterminate them again. So a two state solution is what they better seek unless they want to lose it all with their constant aggression. Is it ideal? No. Would it secure an actual state and begin the process of normalization? Maybe. But first they need to purge terrorists from their leadership. And that's the real stickler considering that shit runs deep in many Arab Nation governments. The two are intertwined just like emergency companies are in the west.

[-] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world -1 points 17 hours ago

Fair enough. However, i don't know about Zionism being fascism. It's simply Israeli nationalism. Sure, there are a few far right Zionists, but they are in the minority.

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

I suppose most Jews can still claim that they descend from Israeli ancestors at some point, and it makes sense.

Just like christians, muslims, and probably the majority of people on the planet. But most convincingly the palestinians who continuously inhabited that land throughout history.

[-] tyler@programming.dev 3 points 18 hours ago

Can you provide some sources I can use for explaining that to others?

this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
1254 points (96.8% liked)

Lefty Memes

4228 readers
2236 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, upvoting good contributions and downvoting those of low-quality!

Rules

0. Only post socialist memes

That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)

1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here

Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.

2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such,

as well as condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.

3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.

That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).

4. No Bigotry.

The only dangerous minority is the rich.

5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.

We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)

6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.

Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.

7. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

(This is not a definitive list, the spirit of the other rules still counts! Eventual duplicates with other rules are for emphasis.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS