this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
772 points (97.4% liked)

movies

1769 readers
151 users here now

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

πŸ”Ž Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
772
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Blaze@lemmy.cafe to c/movies@lemm.ee
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Waterworld is fine. It just gets ragged on because of its insane budget and the lackluster results for said budget. But if you don't care about that and just watch a movie, it's a decent movie.

The Simpsons joke where the tie in video game needs 40 quarters is still funny though.

[–] Welt@lazysoci.al 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is that simply a reference to it going over budget? I never got that joke.

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The movie was infamously over budget. It basically doubled from its initial budget and was for the time a record expensive movie to make. All of that for a final product that was fine but not really showing all that money on screen. It was the topic of many late night show jokes and such.

[–] Rubanski@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What was the reason it went so overboard with the budget?

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 7 points 1 week ago

Storm trashed the key giant expensive set