this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
243 points (86.5% liked)

Political Memes

5425 readers
2302 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I know they still didn't go to Harris but my point is that the story being told that people didn't turn out for Harris just kinda doesn't add up when you look at the only states that actually matter. Popular vote doesn't mean shit. It's just that people turned out more for Trump.

If you have some kind of study that shows every eligible voter in the swing states (or any state, frankly) that didn't vote, would have voted for Harris and not Trump, I'd be happy to see it.

The dull, sad reality is that America, as a whole, wanted this.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well the replicants gained 500000 ish votes and the dems lost 10 million compared to the last election.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

As I said, the popular vote doesn't matter. Harris got more votes than Biden in many of the key swing states. The votes that Dems "lost" were almost entirely exclusive to states that don't matter. As in, Harris could have had all those same Dem votes and still lost the electoral college.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

If you have some kind of study that shows every eligible voter in the swing states (or any state, frankly) that didn’t vote, would have voted for Harris and not Trump, I’d be happy to see it.

Wouldn't need to be every one. If Dems were more disillusioned at a rate of 4-3 (ie for every 4 more [non]votes Harris gets, Trump gets 3 more votes), only 10% more of the electorate turning out would've been enough to shift Pennsylvania. Considering the extensive efforts at demoralizing left-leaning voters, I don't think a 4-3 ratio is absurd.

But nothing is entirely clear. You are correct that if you're looking for facts, we're still waiting for others to compile and analyze the data. God help us all.