this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2024
225 points (93.4% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2181 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Kamala Harris’s presidential campaign failed to connect with low-income workers due to a perceived lack of listening, according to AFL-CIO, the largest federation of labor unions in the US.

While union members largely supported Harris, many low-income voters backed Trump, swayed by his messaging on economic insecurity.

Despite Biden’s pro-labor policies, including infrastructure investments, the AFL-CIO now faces challenges under a likely Trump presidency.

AFL-CIO emphasized labor unions’ resilience and commitment to fighting rollbacks while advancing organizing efforts.

With public approval for unions at a near 60-year high, the labor movement plans both defensive and offensive strategies to protect workers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BMTea@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh yeah, definitely, it's all just Republican propaganda that both of the two parties in a two party system are co-responsible for national and international policy disasters. For sure. Biden definitely wasn't a lame duck president who decided not even to fight for major proposals he promised and instead squandered political capital to defend Bibi and kill babies. Yup.

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Have you not looked at what Biden accomplished even without a majority?

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 3 points 1 week ago

You wouldn't know it looking at his approval rating...

[–] BMTea@lemmy.world -5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The IRA was a bipartisan effort

Had Trump been president a similar bill would have been pushed through due to a post-COVID consensus and a concern over falling behind China. Everything else were accomolishments around the margins outweighed by serious damage to public trust, international stability and affordability.

Biden's abysmal approval ratings are not a failing of Americans to give him proper credit. That's the same argument Reoublicans made during the boom economy of 2017-2019.

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So you haven't actually looked at the policies he pushed through?

[–] BMTea@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It's a little telling that you have yet to refer to a specific one that you find to be earthshatteringly awesome.

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/sep/08/joe-biden-presidency-progressives-donald-trump

It's easy bait against people like you because it tells who has read up and has specific issues against him, and who doesn't (you)

[–] BMTea@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Hahahaha that's an opinion piece, not a piece of legislation make your own arguments for yourself. Tax breaks for green energy! Wow! Something that even fucking broke third world nations have in place! Bravo!

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] BMTea@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wow! Now that I know the Biden administration implemented a new anti-redlining framework for banks that may come into effect in 2026 (provided Trump doesn't scrap it) I realize that he wasn't a lame duck! He was the most transformational orogressive president since FDR! LOL.

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's so incredibly easy to find stuff he's done that it's obvious you're just acting stupid

(or maybe you aren't acting)

[–] BMTea@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago

Nothing he has done is exceptional. He was a lame duck and his accomplishments are middling.