this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2024
1347 points (97.7% liked)

Political Memes

5608 readers
1207 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 50 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Say your going to tax the billionaires at 50% and use that money to pay for Healthcare and child care, don't cozy up to them so you can raise another billion dollars to lose another election .

That was basically Harris' tax plan.

What Would Kamala Harris's Tax Plans Mean For You? | Kiplinger - https://www.kiplinger.com/taxes/kamala-harriss-tax-plans-2024

[–] Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 43 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It doesn't matter what your platform is if it's not communicated effectively to the median voter

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 49 points 1 month ago (6 children)

How do you communicate effectively to someone with their fingers in their ears screaming nananananananana? Please advise, oh political oracle.

[–] Manmoth@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 month ago (3 children)

You go on Joe Rogan for one. Kamala ran the last presidential campaign that will ever rely so heavily on the legacy media apparatus. This whole cycle proved that they are only broadcasting to themselves and real people are elsewhere on podcasts, twitter and YT.

[–] RustyEarthfire@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

She did go on Call Her Daddy.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

She was on traditional media? I guess I wasn’t there to see either candidate. I only saw both online

[–] Not_mikey@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

With all the fucking TV ads and mailers the campaign spent billions on. If the average voters is just covering there ears then why spend so much on advertising or why even campaign at all? Yeah some people are like that but they're deep in the maga cult, there's still a large amount of people open to both sides if the messaging is right that decided this election. Harris' messaging didn't work though.

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I mean the marketing was effective. A lot of people including Donald trump thought he was going to lose. Just not effective at getting people who support Biden to get off their ass.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Trump seemed to get through.

Democrats are forbidden by their patrons from using too much populist rhetoric. That's the number one reason why they fail to connect with what has become a very populist country, thanks to decades of wealth transfer to the top.

Bernie used populist language and the Democratic establishment pulled out all the stops to give us "anybody but Bernie". Now we are living the consequences.

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What's neat is that you appear to have internalized the conservative view of the Democratic machine in this country. They are completely incompetent...but also such shadowy and powerful figures they control what everyone says and does and control who votes for who...except when it comes to republicans who these scary shadowy figures are unable to competently manipulate ever....

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 7 points 1 month ago

If you want to argue today that the Democrats aren't failures at fighting Republicans and specifically Trump, I would love to hear that argument.

There was nothing "shadowy" about the "anybody but Bernie" effort in 2020. They might have preferred it to be quieter, but I think just about every relevant detail of that scheme leaked, and it played out quite transparently. Are you arguing that it didn't happen?

It's not as much about competence as it is about perspective. The Democratic establishment is somewhat competently running strategies that are well suited for the 90s but completely out of touch with where voters are today.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So basically you lie to them and tell them what they want to hear? Stoke fear of "the others" among them to keep them scared and angry?

Yeah, no, I'm good.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago

Is that what you think Bernie does?

People are scared and angry already. Not everyone has the financial stability you apparently do. Republicans focus that fear on the powerless. Democrats pretend it's not there. You can't respond to struggling families with "the economy is great!"

Let Bernie be Encharge. I am jealous that the US has Bernie. Seeing all this shit storm from afar, I now just believe the US doesn't deserve Bernie at all. He is too good for the US.

[–] yogi_pogi@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ah yes, now that you made fun of the prior commenter, we have convinced the world and now Kamala is president?

Bernie is fucking right.

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] yogi_pogi@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You lumped a huge percentage of people as putting their fingers in their ears.

Maga is going to vote maga. And there's a huge chunk that didn't vote or were surprised Biden dropped out. Those folks didn't put their fingers in their ears. Like Bernie said, they were ignored.

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

People who were surprised 5 months after Biden dropped out didn't have their fingers in their ears in your version of the world? I think you and I mean very different things by that phrase.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah those are the epitome of people with the fingers in their ears lol

[–] Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Who do you think the people putting their fingers in their ears are, in this case?

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Check out leopards eating faces for the next few years..those people, whether it's moms surprised the education department is again going to punish their kids, Muslims surprised trump hates Muslims and wants them eradicated, EV company owners who think being allowed to support means being part of the narcissists inner circle, Latinos shocked that their friends or family members there illegally won't get special protections no matter how many times McCarthy rears his head.

[–] Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"EV company owners" aside, most voters in this country just want something to change, and they'll vote for whoever promises the most of it. Harris' campaign didn't do anything nor promise anything that resonated, and practically everything she said ended up morphing into her highly-rehearsed stump speech. No talks about Medicare for All, no talks about the minimum wage, no talks about legalizing weed, and kowtowing to the right on border policy by accepting the 'crisis' framing. Harris also failed to address the situation in Gaza in a way that mattered, even though it was a major issue for undecided voters in key states like Michigan. Over 100,000 Democratic primary voters there cast an uncommitted vote over Biden's handling of Israel and Gaza, which is more than the margin by which she lost the state.

The right took advantage of this. An EV company owner paid a PAC to distribute ostensibly pro-Harris pamphlets in predominantly Arab neighborhoods in Michigan saying she was the most pro-Israel candidate on the ballot. The right helped put abortion rights directly on the state ballots as propositions, letting people believe the choice could be separated from who they voted for (see Florida, where the proposition lost at 57% support when the state voted roughly the same percentage for ol Don).

Harris had a potential base on the progressive left, but the DNC insisted on tweaking her campaign to try to win over right-moderates. That doesn't work anymore, precisely for the "sticking fingers in ears" attitude you mentioned from right-wing voters. It's asinine for the DNC to continue to try and appeal to them, when the median Republican voter thinks Democrats are agents of a satanic agenda. Regardless, the message the DNC seems to have gotten from Nov 5 was that they lost this election because they failed to move to the right hard enough. The ratchet effect continues.

As a side note, I know several trumpets who would've voted for Sanders in 2016 were he the Democratic nominee, and would've voted for Walz even this election were he the main guy on the 2024 presidential ticket. Such people are not very coherent ideologically, they just want someone in who has big ideas.

Unfortunately, it's just not enough to be "not the other guy", even if the other guy is a convicted felon, rapist, and just all-around a downright awful human being.

edit: grammar and wording in a couple spots

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Many of those people will inexplicably be against a 50% tax on billionaires for two reasons: 1) they have no concept of how progressive tax brackets work, and think that means they'd be taking literally half that person's wealth, and 2) they believe that one day they could be in that situation, and when they are, they sure as shit won't want to pay half of their wealth! (spoiler alert: they won't)

And until we can change this type of thinking, we will never make those people pay their fair share.

This is what decades of American Exceptionalism, and Rugged Individualism, does to a nation; Empathy dies, and it becomes every man for themselves.