this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
102 points (99.0% liked)
HistoryPorn
4872 readers
288 users here now
If you would like to become a mod in this community, kindly PM the mod.
Relive the Past in Jaw-Dropping Detail!
HistoryPorn is for photographs (or, if it can be found, film) of the past, recent or distant! Give us a little snapshot of history!
Rules
- Be respectful and inclusive.
- No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
- Engage in constructive discussions.
- Share relevant content.
- Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
- Use appropriate language and tone.
- Report violations.
- Foster a continuous learning environment.
- No genocide or atrocity denialism.
Pictures of old artifacts and museum pieces should go to History Artifacts
Illustrations and paintings should go to History Drawings
Related Communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
She's kinda cute. Healthier looking then I assumed a working woman in the 1910s would be.
She might have been a model, for documenting the uniform standard
What makes you think working people weren't healthy 100-years ago? As to why you think she looks healthy, she's not fat as fuck.
Here's NYC, 11-years previous. What do we see? I see a thriving society.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UERgaTAPKb4
What we won't see is a single fat fuck. And no one can argue this is some sort of suffering, starving society. FFS, they're actively building skyscrapers, pushing tech to the limit.
So many choices of words were made in your comment, and you chose wrong every time. You buried your valid point in fat fucks.
Let's go a little lighter on the language describing individuals if we're going to go for condemnation of modern obesity. It's a society-scale problem.
It is a scale issue, that much you two agree on.