this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
72 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37717 readers
651 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

They knew when to hold em. Knew when to fold 'em. Just not when to walk away and when to run.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kuvwert@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Why do people bother sharing paywalled articles?

[–] Shadow@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago

Wasn't paywalled for me. Wired allows a certain number of views per month so it's not always obvious you're posting something paywalled.

[–] Evergreen5970@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago

I’ll guess that if you bought a subscription to the website, you don’t see the paywall. So you might share it like anything else cool online, forgetting that this thing is paywalled and not everyone will be able to see it.

[–] Pips@lemmy.film 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Either it's not paywalled for them or it's still good journalism and maybe journalists shouldn't work for free.

[–] Kuvwert@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No one implied they should work for free. In fact (according to rumors) there are several alternatives for writers to monitize their content without completely walling off the articles.

[–] Pips@lemmy.film 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Kuvwert@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Google "how writers monitize their content on the internet" it should give you some good insights, as it's not a very complicated topic.

[–] Pips@lemmy.film 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh fascinating, the top response is working for a subscription-based publication that has editorial staff and pays them. The second is freelancing for a subscription-based publication by selling articles to them. Wow.

[–] Kuvwert@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're clearly so skilled with reading, but maybe if you can count past two, you can see the alternatives I mentioned previously.

[–] Pips@lemmy.film 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You mean the rumored several alternatives, that I asked you to elaborate on, and you told me to Google? Yes, clearly you listed specifics.

[–] Kuvwert@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Buddy, I really won't explain something to you that you should be able to figure out in less than 8 seconds. If you truly can't figure out that advertising, sponsorships, and affiliate programs exist there's nothing I can do to help you You're clearly challenged and I wish you luck going foreward..

[–] admin@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] SoManyChoices@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

I do too and it works great. Unfortunately, I tend to be on my iPad in the evenings or early mornings, so I get stymied.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Use firefox browser desktop mode and click the reader mode icon next to the url. it pulls the article text out so you can still read it without the paywall

[–] prole@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Reader mode is clutch for getting around paywalls. I'm just waiting for the day it suddenly stops working.