this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
205 points (98.6% liked)

World News

39102 readers
2204 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 44 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

Somehow I think they would have found another reason if we hadn't authorized deeper strikes. This was literally one of their prototypes, they are just now starting production. It's not something they held back, graciously waiting to use it because the Ukrainians were so polite in their war fighting.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

It's quite useless for attacking Ukraine too.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 12 points 20 hours ago

I wouldn't say useless. anything they can use to blow up strategic targets is going to help them. It's just a hilariously inefficient use of the new missile.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

If test results are expected to be partially falsified by corrupt executors - then relying on your actual enemy to deliver those results makes some sense.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Oh yeah. No doubt. That's not what I'm saying. Putin is claiming this is a measured retaliation and not a test they would have conducted no matter what. Which is hilarious.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

Yes, but he also is very capable of appearing miserable where he actually isn't. That should be considered. Homeless dogs are not very formidable enemies, but they can kill you if you turn your back on them. House pests are not, but it's sometimes a tremendous effort to get rid of them.