this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2024
1191 points (98.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

6023 readers
2179 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 88 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

One of the best conceptualizations of how much money the richest people have is to imagine stacking US dollars, but horizontally instead of vertically. Imagine there was a game where you could walk next to this stack and, when you stopped walking, you'd win all the money you walked past.

In just a few seconds you'd have earned over $10,000, a large sum for most people, but nobody would stop walking then. After just a minute you'd have $1,000,000, a life changing amount of money! What if you kept walking? What if you wanted to be in the top 100 richest in the world?

You'd die from exhaustion well before getting anywhere near the wealth of the top 100. It took only 1 minute to get a life changing amount of money, but it would take more than 4 days of continuous walking to make the $19,500,000,000 needed to crack the top 100.

I got this from this Tom Scott video where he drives for an hour on the highway in order to pass $1 billion.

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 13 points 3 weeks ago

No need to rely on imagination. Here’s Wealth, Shown to scale.

[–] Free_Opinions@feddit.uk 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

A million seconds is 11 days. A billion seconds is 31.5 years.

But also, billionaires don’t have billions of dollars sitting in the bank. While I don’t think any individual should be that wealthy, it’s important to understand what wealth actually means. My own wealth is much more than just the money I can scrape together for next week.

[–] TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

But also, billionaires don’t have billions of dollars sitting in the bank.

No, but some have billions of dollars in the stock market which they can use as a 'bank' anytime they want to buy something. Conveniently for them, all of that stock is unable to be taxed until it's cashed out. Though, why would they ever cash out when they have the free money glitch using it as collateral? If they had it in the bank, then at least the interest could be taxed, I guess.

[–] Free_Opinions@feddit.uk 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Most of my wealth is on the stock market as well but I've already paid income tax on the money I've invested and when I decide to cash it all out I need to pay income tax on the profit too. I don't see why someone should be taxed for having invested on the stock market.

[–] TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Unless you are a billionaire, or close to one, you aren't doing what I was referring to.

Billionaires commonly use their stock as collateral to get low interest loans. Then they use these loans to buy investments with better returns than the low interests loans that they took out. They leverage this additional capital from the investment to take out an another lower interest loan to pay off the original loan.

They get to rinse and repeat this, unless the economy takes a huge nosedive. In that case, the amount of loans they have exceed the gains they are making and they actually have to liquidate assets and actually have to pay a lot of tax. The thing is, this doesn't really happen often.

Unless they get real unlucky, most of them eventually die and pass down these investments to an heir before the economy ever nosedives. The heir can cash out without paying capital gains tax, because they get a fresh starting point at whatever the accumulated wealth was.

Basically, the capitalist class gets to avoid ever paying capital gains tax, and that sucks. This is just one of the ways they avoid paying anything back to the working class, there are plenty of others. They also use lots of legal loopholes to avoid estate tax, but that is another topic.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago

In the bank, yes the interest is taxed. Investments attract tax on dividends, since it's impractical to tax unrealised capital gains

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Okay, I hear you, but I can totally keep up 4 days of walking. Just wanted to say.