this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2024
1076 points (98.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

27144 readers
3670 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] errer@lemmy.world 135 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The fact this guy is still free and has a chance to see these memes must warm his heart

[–] The_v@lemmy.world 86 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He assassinated an immoral asshole who has profited on the needless pain, suffering, and death of millions.

The reaction can't be too surprising.

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 48 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I'm curious about his reasoning. I hope he gets away, just curious if he was denied claims, or if a loved one was, or just sending a message. or if he's just looking for the other half of his Boondocks Saints duo.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's the beauty of it. Millions of people have worse lives because of this asshole, so by having an anonymous killer take him out, we all get to feel a little justice.

[–] Draces@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And thousands(?) have no lives because of this asshole. Dude killed a serial killer as far as I'm concerned

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

The prior-authorization denial rate of United tripled under his leadership.

I don't like vigilante justice, but when "legitimate" paths to justice are denied, this is the inevitable result.

A hungry crowd is an angry mob. Ignore the danger too long, and they'll eventually feast on the flesh of those who oppress them.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

The reasoning or motive are almost suspiciously clear: Thompson ~~is~~ was the CEO of a widely despised health insurance company under scrutiny for a lot of shady shit. The shooting happened just before 7 in the morning on a busy street in the biggest and most active city in the nation. Edit to add: In front of the hotel in which the company's investor meeting was to take place. Left behind at the scene are bullet casings with the words "Delay" "Deny" and "Dispose" written on them which seem to allude to the company's habit of denying medical care.

It's so damn obvious that I'm starting to doubt it.

The thing that really gets me is, I can think of several other grievance killings like this; Timothy McVeigh, The Unabomber, a bunch of their ilk, folks who hurt or killed people over sociopolitical grievances. They tended to be terroristical and only managed to swat vaguely in the direction of their enemy; Timothy McVeigh for example bombed a government building killing or injuring hundreds of non-policy making government employees from a number of different agencies, and 19 children in the building's daycare center. Kaczynski was kind of mad that the modern world had happened and mailed bombs to universities.

Then we have this latest guy, who apparently had a beef with UnitedHealthCare, and dealt with it by assassinating the CEO with a silenced pistol. One rich asshole down, one terse yet loud and clear message delivered to the rest of his ilk, no innocent bystanders hurt.

When's the last time that happened in the English-speaking world?

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

One rich asshole down, one terse yet loud and clear message delivered to the rest of his ilk, no innocent bystanders hurt.

This right here is the message the aristocracy doesn't want you to hear. I can't count the number of times this guy was referred to as a "mass shooter" in the news.

No. He was not a "mass shooter". Mass shooters shoot innocent civilians en masse. This guy was an assassin. One target, one goal.

it was never about either of them.

5mlc3z-47451610

Look at it from corporate media's perspective: He shot a lot of dollars.

[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No. He was not a "mass shooter". Mass shooters shoot innocent civilians en masse. This guy was an assassin. One target, one goal.

While I obviously agree that it can't be described accurately as a mass shooting, I still wonder:

Do the victims need to be innocent for it to be a mass shooting?

From a philosophical POV there's a issue of defining what an innocent person is (I mean some Christian societies will say that nobody's innocent). Is innocence to be judged through the eyes of the shooter or society?

Anyway, that wasn't the point I set out to make, so let's set that aside.

Suppose one was to go to a convention of child molesters, war criminals, and nazi death camp guards, and you start shooting indiscriminately. I hope we can agree that members of the categories listed should be classified as "not innocents" by any contemporary standard. Even if only people guilty of the previously mentioned things got hit, wouldn't it still be a mass shooting once a certain number had been shot?

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fairy tales do not tell children that monsters exist. Children already know that monsters exist. Fairy tales tell children that monsters can be killed.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

History is full of these. But we somehow think we are better than our pasts. And the rich are counting on us being the ethical ones.

People are starting to realize that is a huge miscalculation.

[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

Artssassination.

[–] PrimeMinisterKeyes@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] blarth@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] theangryseal@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Appears to be JFK (1991).

[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Take my energy king!