this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
329 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

59972 readers
3178 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
329
Google gets an error-corrected quantum bit to be stable for an hour (arstechnica.com)
submitted 1 week ago by misk@sopuli.xyz to c/technology@lemmy.world
110 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Buttons@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It sounds like your saying a large quantum computer is easier to make than a small quantum computer?

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

That is one of the things the article says. That making certain parts of the processor bigger reduces error rates.

[–] obbeel 1 points 1 week ago

I think that means the current quantum computers made using photonics, right? Those are really big though.