Not The Onion

12529 readers

1374 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

654

Hornets apologize after pretending to give child PS5 and taking it away off camera - Yahoo Sports (sports.yahoo.com)

submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

103 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The skit that "missed the mark" occurred in a break in play during the second quarter of Charlotte's game against the Philadelphia 76ers on Monday. The child was brought onto the court with Hugo, the Hornets' mascot, dressed as Santa Claus. After a letter to Santa requesting a PS5 was read out loud, a cheerleader came out with a bag containing the video game console.

The young fan was visibly overjoyed as he received the pricy gift. However, according to an online acquaintance, he was less happy when the cameras turned off and a Hornets staffer took it away, replacing it with a jersey.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca -5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Gift law

The donor of the gift must have a present intent to make a gift of the property to the donee

Intent needs to be proven or it's not a gift. They did not intend on giving a gift.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

The cheerleader and other people around were reportedly also confused when the PS5 was confiscated. The child's uncle was apparently informed he wouldn't get to keep the gift, but not the child himself.

They unfortunately made the kid fully believe their whole intent was to give him the gift. That's so sad for the kid. :(

I wonder how this would play out in court, though. The company can argue that it was the uncle's responsibility to inform the kid as he was with him, but the kid's parents can argue the uncle wasn't his legal guardian and that he needed to be informed personally to play along.

Idk, this armchair is comfy though. lol