this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2024
34 points (97.2% liked)
askchapo
22814 readers
509 users here now
Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.
Rules:
-
Posts must ask a question.
-
If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.
-
Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.
-
Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I was fine-ish about this comment until here. It's not dead in the store if people don't buy it.
and if I don't get a plastic bag... the store still has plastic bags regardless
that's my point, that framing has cause and effect backwards! It's how the capitalists want you to view it; as though consumption causes things to happen. They want us to think our leverage comes from what we choose to buy. It's not. They've already made the decision, already built the infrastructure and set production in motion. At best, we decide the rate it gets consumed. Maybe, maybe if you tie it a strike - the thing that actually gives us leverage over the system, and the thing they desperately would rather us not talk about - a boycott can achieve something. But on its own? Abstaining can't eliminate something from being made, it just makes space for one more option.
It makes it so less animals have to live through industrial horror life. And creates the space in this world where we're moving past all that.