this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2024
401 points (98.5% liked)

Movies

7599 readers
328 users here now

Lemmy

Welcome to Movies, a community for discussing movies, film news, box office, and more! We want this to be a place for members to feel safe to discuss and share everything they love about movies and movie related things. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow!


Related Communities:

!books@lemmy.world - Discussing books and book-related things.

!comicbooks@lemmy.world - A place to discuss comic books of all types.

!marvelstudios@lemmy.world - LW's home for all things MCU.


While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by the Lemmy.World Terms of Service: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

  1. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed

  4. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem.

    Regarding spoilers; Please put "(Spoilers)" in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers, as we do not currently have a spoiler tag available. If your post contains an image that could be considered a spoiler, please mark the thread as NSFW so the image gets blurred. As far as how long to wait until the post is no longer a spoiler, please just use your best judgement. Everyone has a different idea on this, so we don't want to make any hard limits.

    Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread. Most of the Lemmy clients don't support this but we want to get into the habit as clients will be supporting in the future.

Failure to follow these guidelines will result in your post/comment being removed and/or more severe actions. All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. We ask that the users report any comment or post that violates the rules, and to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The report outlined that the fallout is due to differences over the creative direction of the franchise, with Amazon reportedly in favour of “Marvel-style” ideas to expand the franchise, such as spinoff shows and films.

No, for fucks sake. No!

Broccoli is reported to have baulked at the pitch, telling friends that Amazon are “fucking idiots” who are taking the franchise “hostage”. She has reportedly expressed her disinterest in continuing to work with Amazon for any Bond films. NME has reached out to Amazon MGM Studios for comment.

"Fucking idiots" indeed. And too predictable, to be honest.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EveningPancakes@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I think your phone autocorrected Timothy Dalton

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 2 points 12 hours ago

I give Dalton a lot of credit. He was making Bond in the middle of the AIDS era. They had to cut out the wild, promiscuous sex and even denied him cigarettes. It was like making a Superman movie where the actor had to be in Clark Kent's clothes and never wore the cape.

[–] dalekcaan@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What's wrong with Dalton? I liked Living Daylights. Licence to Kill was alright too. They went too far in the "gritty" direction on the latter in my personal opinion, but at least they were trying something new, especially since some of the later Moore films went a little too far in the "wacky" direction (cough cough Moonraker)

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 2 points 12 hours ago

Dalton did a great job with what he was given. The first few minutes of Brosnan's movie brought back the cigarettes and casual sex. Dalton's Bond was 'cleaned up' for the AIDS era.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Moonraker is my favorite. If that kicks me out of the fan club so be it. Daniel Craig is my favorite Bond though.

[–] dalekcaan@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't get me wrong, I like Moonraker, and Moore's Bond for that matter.

It's just that sometimes you're watching a spy movie and the US launches a space shuttle into orbit, which is met by a space shuttle owned by ~~Elon Musk~~ some billionaire space tycoon (which he stole from himself), then they both open up and a bunch of army guys and billionaire goons float out and have a laser gun space battle, and you kinda have to step back and wonder how you got there.

[–] ineffable@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 hours ago

And considering that the book has nothing to do with space...

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

arguably the Daniel Craig ones did that by being actually fairly believable spy movies that made slight sense.

Bond is about using a magic watch to blow up vaguely Russian people and sleep with barely legal teenagers

[–] cobysev@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

[...] sleep with barely legal teenagers

Funny you should say that. Roger Moore gave up the Bond role when he realized that his Bond girl co-star was younger than his own daughter. He felt really icky having romance scenes with her and decided it was time to end his contract.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

If Bond is about that, why does the Daniel Craig Bond use almost no gadgets?

At least the first 3 movies, the only gadgets is like a handgun that detects who uses it, a Bond car from the Sean Connery era, some explosive necklace and ... a phone.

[–] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 hours ago

That was their point. They were trying to draw a distinction between the Bond era prior to Craig, and after, where they argue that the lack of goofy gimmicks and at least slightly more grounded plots that represent the Craig era are the departure from the definitive Bond years.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's pretty much what I just said?

[–] Klear@sh.itjust.works 5 points 21 hours ago

But why male models?

[–] lime@feddit.nu 3 points 1 day ago

actual answer: because austin powers made gadgets uncool. there's an interview with craig abut that.

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'll just say, George Lazenby was disliked so much he was only in one film. Though, he got the role in a very James Bond way.

[–] koberulz@lemmy.ml 1 points 13 hours ago

No, Lazenby quit because he thought he was above the role and would have a better career without it.