this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2024
902 points (98.6% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

3895 readers
1325 users here now

/c/TenFoward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Remember that diversity and coexistence are Star Trek values. Any post/comments that are racist, anti-LGBT, or generally "othering" of a group will result in removal/ban.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon'

~ 8. No Political Upheaval. Political commentary is allowed, but please keep discussions civil. Read here for our community's expectations.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

!startrek@lemmy.world

!memes@lemmy.world

!tumblr@lemmy.world

!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Honorary Badbitch:

@jawa21@startrek.website for realizing that the line used to be "want to be added to the sidebar?" and capitalized on it. Congratulations and welcome to the sidebar. Stamets is both ashamed and proud.


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 84 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Guaranteed if original Star Trek came out today, it would be decried as "woke" and "DEI" and there would be outrage over it from the usual culture warriors.

[–] hesusingthespiritbomb@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just out of curiosity, what do you think is more progressive: a spaceship where all female crew is forced to wear miniskirts, a bridge crew that has exactly one woman, the part in the pilot where "Orion sex slaves" are introduced in the horniest possible way, or the married producer who was cheating on his wife with the only two relevant female cast members?

The 1960s was a long time ago. While there are a lot of TOS that aged very well, the idea that the show would be decried as woke is straight up delusional.

[–] graff@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not to be that guy, but in the 60s, mini skirts were considered an empowerment. It was the beginning of the sexual revolution after all. In contemporary times it won't be a miniskirt, it would be something else.

When people say "if star trek were made today" they don't mean time travelling Roddenberry, studio, and crew to today without changes. They mean creating star trek to today to tackle contemporary issues.

[–] hesusingthespiritbomb@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Cow pies. "Original Star Trek" clearly referred to TOS.

If OC meant a modern rendition of classic trek, they wouldn't be speaking in hypotheticals. They'd just refer to SNW by name.

[–] graff@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In the hypothetical scenario that I presented, star trek never existed and was created for the first time in contemporary times.

Strange New Worlds doesn't fit in this discussion because star trek was already created in 1966 and this is a prequel/spin-off of that series

So by "original Star Trek" you're actually referring to a fundamentally different series. This hypothetical version of Star Trek magically keeps everything you like about it, while shedding anything problematic or downright bad.

The lengths anyone on this site will go to avoid admitting that they made a stupid hot take comment is wild.

[–] H1jAcK@lemm.ee 50 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Okay, I've finally looked up what DEI means... Diversity, equity, and inclusion are things people are berated for??

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 47 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's not what DEI means. It's about what it stands for.

Conservatives don't want to be told to treat people with decency. They want to treat however the fuck they want, and then tell you that you aren't treating them decently.

It's about wielding power.

This is what they mean with those "My rights don't end where your feelings begin" bumper stickers. The only right they're losing is the right to being a bigoted asshole.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

DEI is the current iteration of affirmative action, that’s all.

The problem with DEI is that it’s an imperfect solution that only came about because racists and other bigots couldn’t behave themselves. Forcing the hiring of specific demographics isn’t going to result in the best possible outcomes in every case but those groups also need opportunities even though they’ve been systemically given worse educations and have been generally shat upon. Removing race we’d also probably hire the white man more often but not because they’re inately better, but rather because they are simply more likely to be able to afford to have pretty looking resumés compared to disadvantaged minorities.

We wouldn’t need DEI in the first fucking place except people like an old boss, who saw an immigrant classmate of mine’s resumé come up and because of his African last name said “no thanks I want to keep jobs in Canada”, need to be forced to do the right thing. They create the problem and throw temper tantrums when we try to fix it. These people are obstacles and it’s getting tiring.

TL;DR: They feel as if they have a point because DEI can result in a more qualified person being turned away, which I get feels unfair. However, they refuse to acknowledge the fact that said person was only more qualified because we make it so difficult for minorities to fucking do anything. I’m getting so sick of right-wing bullshit.

[–] chuymatt@startrek.website 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Also, DEI is trying to diversify the points of view in the workplace. Homogeny of thought is NOT better when it comes to problem solving. Varied voices can create amazing solutions to problems one didn’t know really existed. If allowed, it builds creativity.

[–] CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

The issue with this is you often end up with a diverse group of people who are all very educated and grew up in upper-middle class or even upper class homes. It's a diversity of race and gender but with everyone having the same values anyway. I've seen it myself being the only person in my workplace who grew up poor, you realize how little the rest of it really matters.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

In my field anyway it’s not about background, it’s shitty managers not listening to anyone and only wanting to hear about how great they are. I am a tall white man and they still don’t wanna here even the littlest bit of polite feedback. I handled them more carefully than children and they still moaned and cried.

Diversity is good, and I do not think my experience is a reason to not care about it, but removing those worthless bosses is the only thing that will actually allow real change to actually happen.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago (1 children)

YES, it's insane. It's like saying "be a decent person" and people going "Fuck you, commie bastards, I do what I want."

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

From 2020 on we’ve seen that telling people “hey wear the most basic of facemasks when you’re out in public because the morgues are running out of space all over” causes them to start screaming at the Walmart greeters and throwing tantrums like children. We are still stupid apes in a lot of ways

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago

The outrage the far-right spun over DEI is by trying to portray it as hiring vastly underqualified applicants simply because of their belonging to an underrepresented group (often even being portrayed as vastly underqualified because of their race as white supremacist rhetoric). Of course in reality this wasn't true and it was just a foghorn for racism/an ethnic slur, but that's how it started.

[–] 31337@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

A lot of people seem to use "DEI" as a stand-in for the "n-word."

Same people who couldn't pronounce "affirmative action" without scare quotes and italics.

"It's these "Affirmative Action" people..."

[–] H1jAcK@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago

My brother in Christ...

Counterpoint: As long as they consider the women "hot" they will accept them as part of the franchise.

Nichelle Nichols I think was probably hot enough to not draw their ire.

Those culture warriors are somehow always okay with women they view as "fuckable." Women only have value in their eyes if they want to sleep with them by their looks alone.