this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2025
321 points (95.2% liked)

Technology

60303 readers
2849 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] x00z@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago (4 children)

I see nobody talking about this, but aren't the Waymo(s) trained on data which most likely did not include these robots yet?

It seems like this is just something that'll probably happen a lot whenever something new is introduced on the roads.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Expect reCaptcha to ask you to identify food delivery robots soon.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Wouldn't be surprised tbh.

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I don't know about the equipment of Waymo cars, but I would be surprised if they didn't have LIDARs or some other form of distance based environment detection.

And that should be sufficient to implement basic obstacle detection. You don't need to use machine learning if you can use sensors telling you that "something is too close".

[–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago

The article title is misleading as usual.

The car collided after hitting the brakes, seems there wasn't any real damage. It seems the system is designed to only lessen the impact when it detects the obstacle as non-human. If it would have recognized the robot as human, it would have probably acted differently.

Better to hit the object and lessen the impact than to fully brake/avoid and risk worse.

[–] BritishJ@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Well, they should try to avoid any object in the road to be honest. Imagine a new toy comes out that a child is on. Sorry we killed that child l, we didn't train it on that new toy.

Its just an unacceptable answer to be honest.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

That is also very true.

It's not a Tesla so I'm sure they are investigating the cause.

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (2 children)

but aren't the Waymo(s) trained on data which most likely did not include these robots yet?

You can say that about nearly 100% of humans as well.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

So I'm finding it hard to find a release date for humans, but I'm fairly sure they predated the invention of self-driving cars.

For example I seem to remember being alive in the 1990s

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)