this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2025
245 points (88.4% liked)

Not The Onion

12655 readers
1327 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive link

Not the hotdogs!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 9 points 2 days ago (3 children)

How so? Genuinely asking. Is that not a credible source?

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's a piece of media that's critical of a fascist regime, and the person who says it's fake is a .ml

if they ever answer, it'll be dismissive about how all western media is biased against china/nk/Russia. That's as close to an explanation of "why it's fake" as you'll get.

You should always be critical of any media that doesn't have a concrete source though. I don't personally know anything about radiofreeasia, so fuck if I know how reliable they are to begin with.

[–] TurtleOnASkateboard@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

if they ever answer, it’ll be dismissive about how all western media is biased against china/nk/Russia. That’s as close to an explanation of “why it’s fake” as you’ll get.

Look through the modlog for Removed Comments. The answers kesucay is removing talk about how it's a CIA-linked org with staff appointed by Washington.

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And none of them back those claims up. Or actually attack the credibility of the story.

Now then, are you here to defend Kim Jong Un too?

[–] TurtleOnASkateboard@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And none of them back those claims up.

"those claims" meaning that RFA is linked to US intelligence/politics?

Are you saying RFA isn't a branch of US interests? I have never heard anyone make that claim before.

See 1st paragraph: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Agency_for_Global_Media

38north.org is a pretty decent source on North Korean news.

Or actually attack the credibility of the story.

You have the burden of proof backwards: WHY would anyone believe that "hot dogs are banned in North Korea". It simply makes no sense. The burden of proof is on the person making the claim.

There's no reason to think the story is credible. I've searched it and it appears RFA posted it in November, then The Sun picked it up 3 days ago. Then various repeaters.