this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
875 points (96.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

6129 readers
3470 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://kbin.earth/m/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone/t/818591

town that always catches on fire rule

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AtomicHotSauce@lemmy.world 74 points 13 hours ago (5 children)

Retired firefighter/paramedic here. It’s simple: Fire departments don’t normally generate revenue. It’s a money-sink and local governments don’t like that. The first things financially cut when I worked for a city of 170,000 were always services that didn’t make money. That’s just how it works.

Why police departments need heavy armor and assault accoutrements is beyond me, though. I mean, all that shit didn’t help whatsoever in most mass-shootings.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, And?

Of course it's a sink. With that reasoning, taxes are sinks for citizens. The entire oiintis that you get something back for it .

[–] Cheems@lemmy.world 1 points 25 minutes ago

I think to the mass of people, if they can see a cop that means the money is going to something tangible that a politician can point to and say we did all of these numbers because cops. While firefighters the more money you put in, it doesn't as easily translate to a figure that you can point to and say we did all this fire stuff. Which then the general populous gets pissed off that their tax dollars are being wasted.

It doesn't make it right, smart, sensible or logical. But the general population doesn't really care about that.

[–] FeloniousPunk@lemmy.today 45 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

They need to understand it’s a service, not a business. Sure, a fire department doesn’t make money but, neither does a city that burns to the ground.

As a society, we have simply got to get past the notion that everything that exists needs to be monetized to be deemed worthy of existence.

They don't think that way. "It does not generate revenue, therefore it cannot be allowed to exist." This philosophy is so deeply ingrained into the American psyche that it is inescapable.

Story time: American colleague and Canadian colleague are talking. Canadian says that university costs only 5000 CAD in tuition. American nearly falls out of his chair and yells, "BUT HOW DO THEY MAKE MONEY??"

And bear in mind that he was one of the most educated and successful people I have ever met, and yet he found it so difficult to fathom that a university could exist without making money. Now with that in mind, imagine convincing a large group of average people to fund public services.

This is why the USA is the way that it is.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 14 points 10 hours ago

You don't even need to go that far. From a financial perspective, a fire department is a hedge bet against fire. It doesn't exist to generate revenue, but it limit losses.

Not unlike fire insurance, except insurance only protects against the validation of property while a fire fighting team protects the real assets.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 65 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

It’s a money-sink and local governments don’t like that. The first things financially cut when I worked for a city of 170,000 were always services that didn’t make money. That’s just how it works.

The whole point of government is to collect taxes to pay for stuff that isn't revenue generating to spread out the costs!

[–] AdamBomb@lemmy.sdf.org 49 points 12 hours ago

Seriously, this. Government is supposed to fund services, not profitable businesses

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

But that's socialism, noooooo \s

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

Meanwhile the government running businesses for profit is essentially the definition of socialism lol

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 10 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

The government isn't a business, for fuck's sake! Some services like police, fire, health are necessary, but don't generate revenue! Also, even the most profitable corporations on the planet still have IT, Management, and HR departments that don't technically make money.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 13 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

I saw Rebel Ridge on Netflix, could very well be that police departments generate revenue through Civil Forfeiture.

(It’s a fictional thriller, not a documentary, but very much based on modern realities)

[–] BlackPenguins@lemmy.world 12 points 12 hours ago

Did somebody say John Oliver story that enrages me how fucked up America is as a country?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3kEpZWGgJks

[–] SolOrion@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Molly's Game also includes Civil Forfeiture. I wouldn't call it a major part of the plot, but it's definitely there and described as bullshit.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

Tickets. Police departments have quotas because that's their main revenue source, civil forfeiture is just the icing on the cake.