this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
365 points (93.8% liked)

RPGMemes

10410 readers
538 users here now

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Since my polymorph meme has only garnered three downvotes so far I thought I'd offer a bit more controversial take, and see if I can manage to stir the pot a bit with this one.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CerealNommer@ttrpg.network -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

You can't "hit someone else"* because of the stipulations in contingency. RAI I'm sure they don't want you sucking the life from your left buttcheek to close up the mortal wound in your gut, but based on what they wrote, I haven't found a solid contradiction to this plan in the rules-as-written.

Also you can deal damage to something that is fully damaged. There's even a specific rule for "Damage at 0 Hit Points." under the Death Saving Throws section.

[–] oxideseven@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago

That still doesn't address vampiric touches life restoration RAI. Heck even RAW the spell says damage to others.

This is still a no go lol.

[–] Kryomaani@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I haven’t found a solid contradiction to this plan in the rules-as-written.

If you read Vampiric Touch it's literally in the first sentence:

The touch of your shadow-wreathed hand can siphon life force from others to heal your wounds.

[–] CerealNommer@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, that's not exclusionary, nor does it have any bearing on the two sentences necessary for the meme combo. In any other circumstance everyone would rightfully be calling BS on that kind of cherry-picking.

If someone were claiming:

"Well it specifically says favored enemy and you made friends with Bob's Orc character last session, so you no longer have advantage to track him."

or:

“Cavaliers also learn how to guard those in their charge from harm, […]“ You’re not the boss of this noble you’re escorting so you’re Protection reaction doesn’t work to save him.

they would be derisively ignored. And rightly so.

A statement explaining you can use the following ability for this typical use case, does not mean “THIS IS THE ONLY USE FOR THE FOLLOWING ABILITY! THIS USE AND NO OTHER!!“