this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
1001 points (95.7% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

558 readers
1278 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

no, they allowed the chinese part of the company full access to all US data and they were found out

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The only articles I saw were for headcount data. Literally just confirming the number of users. They embarked on an entire project for it and then the goal posts were taken off the field.

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

do you not have google or bing in china? just search for "tiktok ban reason" and you'll find articles like this: https://www.nytimes.com/article/tiktok-ban.html

Lawmakers and regulators in the West have increasingly expressed concern that TikTok and its parent company, ByteDance, may put sensitive user data, like location information, into the hands of the Chinese government. They have pointed to laws that allow the Chinese government to secretly demand data from Chinese companies and citizens for intelligence-gathering operations.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah and I remember when Bush expressed concern there would be mushroom cloud over New York city. Lawmakers saying vague shit isn't evidence. Hell politicians saying specific shit isn't evidence without the evidence. We just spent a year debunking half the shit Biden said about the Gaza war because he insisted on straight up repeating whatever lame excuse the war criminals thought up.

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

dood. they were only vague in their speeches, then the US congess made a very detailed, specific law mid last year. then tiktok ignored some details of it and got a chance to correct it, but didn't.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

That law forced a fire sale of TikTok by name. I wouldn't follow it either, it's blatantly unconstitutional. The Constitution very clearly, in plain English, bans the practice of punishing specific people and organizations via legislation instead of the justice system.

This is also like citing the laws against Marijuana when asked for evidence the laws against Marijuana are necessary. Entirely circular. There's still no evidence there.

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

tiktok could have just started a US based company and sell US operations to them for $1. and of course they knew that.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

That is not true. That would still be either a subsidiary or a sell off. In the first case it doesn't satisfy the law. In the second case it's a very extreme fire sale, more extreme than was actually expected.